DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moreau v. Tonry, 339 So. 2d 3.

16 citing documents.

  • John Nickelson v. Henry Whitehorn and Kyle R. Ardoin, in his official capacity as Louisiana Secretary of State La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
  • Jenkins v. Williamson-Butler 883 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • Pitre v. Secretary of State 791 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    the Louisiana Supreme Court rejected the argument advanced by the plaintiff that if the number of irregularities exceed the difference between the candidates, the outcome of the election cannot be determined.
  • Adkins v. Huckabay 755 So. 2d 206 La. 2000
    Acts 697 , § 1, and jurisprudence, see
  • Savage v. Edwards 722 So. 2d 1004 La. 1998
    While I agree with the result, I disagree with the reasoning of the court of appeal in the present case
  • Savage v. Edwards 728 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    the Louisiana Supreme Court rejected the argument advanced by the plaintiff that if the number of irregularities exceed the difference between the candidates, the outcome of the election cannot be determined.
  • Arvie v. Skinner 722 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    the Louisiana Supreme .Court rejected the argument advanced by the plaintiff that if the number of irregularities exceed the difference between the candidates, the outcome of the election cannot be determined.
  • Colvin v. FRANKLIN PARISH SCHOOL BD. 668 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    the Louisiana Supreme Court rejected the argument advanced by the plaintiff that if the number of irregularities exceed the difference between the candidates, the outcome of the election cannot be determined.
  • Merritt v. Hathorn 537 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    appeal dismissed 430 U.S. 925 , 97 S.Ct.
  • Scoggins v. Jones 442 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    it was found that 315 more votes were cast on voting machines than signatures on the precinct registers — out of a total of almost 100,000 votes cast.
  • Huckaby v. Hunter 427 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    In an earlier case, involving a contest between two candidates, the Supreme Court again faced this issue and held that: "The statutory rule in Louisiana is that an election may be upset only if the one contesting the election can show that `but for irregularities or fraud he would have been nominated...'
  • Veuleman v. O'CON 417 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    With regard to appellate review of election contests, (La.
  • Wayne v. Green 389 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Brunet v. Evangeline Parish Board of Supervisors of Elections 379 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    the court, discussing the grounds for upsetting an election, stated: “The statutory rule in Louisiana is that an election may be upset only if the one contesting the election can show that ‘but for irregularities or fraud he would have been nominated’.” The court went on to add: “If the candidate cannot p
  • Meyer v. Keller 376 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    [1] Also, wherein it was stated: "The statutory rule in Louisiana is that an election may be upset only if the one contesting the election can show that `but for irregularities or fraud he would have been nominated' .
  • Kelly v. Village of Greenwood 363 So. 2d 887 La. 1978
    appeal dismissed, 430 U.S. 925 , 97 S.Ct.