Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cox, 344 So. 2d 1024.

36 citing documents.

State v. Baker 970 So. 2d 948 La. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Brisco 933 So. 2d 754 La. 2006
This court noted that "`[c]riminal and penal laws are to be strictly construed and in the absence of an express legislative intent any doubt should be resolved in favor of lenity.'" Street, 480 So.2d at 312
State v. Baker 935 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
where the court declined to permit an enhanced penalty for felony simple escape from the Department of Corrections to be used to support an habitual offender bill.
State v. White 907 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Anders 820 So. 2d 513 La. 2002
State v. Anders 778 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Walker 775 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Hayden 767 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
he argues that simple escape and related charges may not be used as a basis for adjudicating a defendant as a multiple offender.
State v. Antoine 721 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Dunn 713 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
however, since State v. Cox was decided, the legislature has amended the criminal statute to make simple escape a separate and distinct felony.
State v. Keys 694 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Hatter 657 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
After the amendment, the rationale of the [State v.] Cox [ ], [State v.] Taylor [ ] and [State v.] Siegel [ (La.
State v. Stewart 656 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Townley 657 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
which held that a conviction for simple escape could not be employed in seeking to have a defendant declared an habitual offender under La.R.S.
State Ex Rel. Mims v. Butler 601 So. 2d 649 La. 1992
State v. Harrelson 590 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
He further submits that, he could not be adjudicated a habitual offender.
State v. McCord 551 So. 2d 1329 La. 1989
Overruled State v. Goodin 550 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
He alleged that his sentence for simple escape cannot be enhanced under the habitual offender law
State v. Harris 511 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
4th Cir.1983), writ denied was wrongly decided and should be overruled since it conflicts with the Supreme Court’s
State v. Foster 509 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Davis 499 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Defendant argues, however, that Jackson was wrongly decided, relying on several Louisiana Supreme Court decisions:
State v. Whittaker 496 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Lindsey 491 So. 2d 371 La. 1986
Accordingly, we conclude that R.S.
State v. King 490 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
support the trial court's ruling.
State v. Street 480 So. 2d 309 La. 1985
State v. Victorian 448 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Davis 448 So. 2d 645 La. 1984
State v. Morris 429 So. 2d 111 La. 1983
State v. Freeman 411 So. 2d 1068 La. 1982
State v. Bruins 407 So. 2d 685 La. 1981
and cases cited therein.
State v. Murray 357 So. 2d 1121 La. 1978
See State v. Cox, La., (1977); State v. Sanders, La., (1976).
State v. Young 357 So. 2d 503 La. 1978
and cases cited therein.
State v. Siegel 354 So. 2d 525 La. 1978
(all decided prior to the present sentencing hearing).
State v. Taylor 347 So. 2d 172 La. 1977
Two of our recent decisions, State v. Schamburge, La., (1977) and State v. Cox, La., (1977), warrant our vacating defendant's sentence.