Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Frank, 344 So. 2d 1039.

39 citing documents.

State v. Pierre 131 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Thomas 90 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Douglas 72 So. 3d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Harris 66 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Aleman, 01-743 at 13; 809 So.2d at 1066 .
State v. Nelson 3 So. 3d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Benoit 960 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Harold 861 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Bouie 817 So. 2d 48 La. 2002
State v. Aleman 809 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Bennett 623 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Van Buren 615 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Harmon 594 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Scott 490 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that: A judge’s disposition to impose a lenient sentence during plea discussions should not be understood as setting a limit for the justifiable sentence under accepted principles of criminal justice.
State v. Lowe 485 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Bentley, 219 La.
Hoffman v. Hoffman 480 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. O'NEAL 478 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Bentley, 219 La.
State v. Ashley 463 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Hebert 443 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
[1] *623 The trial judge in denying the motion for mistrial stated in part: "I think that there are a number of cases, including State vs. Culberth, ; State vs. Henderson, ; State vs. Simms (sic), ; State vs. Frank, ; State vs. Braxton, , that, in effect, consistently recognized the propriety of the State's commenting on the lact of refuting evidence, or in this case, evidence which was contradicted or uncontradicted, produced by a defendant.
State v. Tully 430 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
270 , (1972); State v. Jackson .
State v. Simone 428 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Dunbar, supra; Frank v. Blackburn, 605 F.2d 910 (5th Cir.1979), vacated in part 646 F.2d 873 , cert.
State v. Burkhalter 428 So. 2d 449 La. 1983
State v. Bentley, 219 La.
State v. Johnson 426 So. 2d 95 La. 1983
State v. Howard, 262 La.
State v. Culpepper 434 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
State v. Barkley 412 So. 2d 1380 La. 1982
State v. Stephenson 412 So. 2d 553 La. 1982
State v. Frisco 411 So. 2d 37 La. 1982
Wade, supra; Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. Jones 398 So. 2d 1049 La. 1981
State v. Curry 390 So. 2d 506 La. 1980
State v. Bentley, 219 La.
State v. Fullilove 389 So. 2d 1282 La. 1980
State v. Kenner 384 So. 2d 413 La. 1980
State v. Albert 381 So. 2d 424 La. 1980
State v. Murray 375 So. 2d 80 La. 1979
*87 (La.1977); (on rehearing); State v. Howard, 262 La.
State v. Jackson 360 So. 2d 842 La. 1978
In State v. Frank, La., (1977), we stated: "A sentence has three general objectives: deterrence, rehabilitation, and public protection."
State v. Dunbar 356 So. 2d 956 La. 1978
State v. Demouchet 353 So. 2d 1025 La. 1977
State Ex Rel. Clark v. Marullo 352 So. 2d 223 La. 1977
State v. Williams 349 So. 2d 286 La. 1977
1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967)
State v. Taylor 347 So. 2d 172 La. 1977
State v. Frank, La., (1977); State v. Fortenberry, La., (1975); State v. Moseley, La., (1973).