Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Odom v. Odom, 345 So. 2d 1154.

16 citing documents.

Hebert v. Hebert 269 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Martzell v. Wydooghe 737 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Whittenberg v. Whittenberg 710 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
However, in *1159 the Louisiana Supreme Court noted a split among the circuit courts concerning continuing jurisdiction; (La.App.
Washington v. Washington 562 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
The Supreme Court was faced with a
Martin v. Martin 545 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Tutorship of Peavy 535 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
See additional case citations in the dissent of Chief Justice Sanders’
Counts v. Bracken 494 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Fredericks v. Fox 457 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the court held the concept of “continuing jurisdiction,” although valid in certain areas of domestic law, did not necessarily apply to cases involving custody of children who no longer resided within the state.
Parrish v. Parrish 448 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Price v. Price 445 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
the court found that the notion of continuing jurisdiction did not apply in a change of custody action where the custodial parent and the children no longer lived in Louisiana.
Steadman v. Steadman 393 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Sims v. Sims 388 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Folsom v. Folsom 372 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Miller v. Miller 363 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
McCarstle v. McCarstle 356 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
In his brief filed in this court plaintiff for the first time raises the question of jurisdiction on the basis of Odom v. Odom, La., (1977).
DeFatta v. DeFatta 352 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977