DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Anderson, 349 So. 2d 311.

75 citing documents.

  • State v. Williams 580 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Fisher 570 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • Parkerson v. Lynn 556 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Johnson 552 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Robinson 549 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Nasworthy 542 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Bennett 524 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Battista 517 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Hymes 513 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Jefferson 511 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    the Supreme Court held that this “maximum sentence” was not necessarily the sentence imposed by the trial court, but was the actual sentence served whether it was diminished by good time or increased by revocation of parole or probation.
  • State v. Miller 499 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Lowery 491 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Mistretta 490 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Killion 483 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the "maximum sentence" referred to in the above-cited statute was not necessarily the sentence imposed by the trial court, but was the actual sentence served whether it was diminished by good time or increased by revocation of parole or probation.
  • State v. Sherry 482 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Lambert 475 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hall 464 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Baker 452 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the court noted that the statutory intent of the habitual offender law is that a sentence expires when the prisoner is discharged from state custody and supervision.
  • State v. Martin 427 So. 2d 1182 La. 1983
  • State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Maggio 422 So. 2d 1121 La. 1982
  • State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981
  • State v. Vincent 387 So. 2d 1097 La. 1980
  • State v. Turner 365 So. 2d 1352 La. 1978
  • State ex rel. Bruard v. Blackburn 363 So. 2d 1387 La. 1978
  • State v. Washington 353 So. 2d 258 La. 1977
    we stated that: “[A] sentence expires when the prisoner is discharged from state custody and supervision, not when the theoretical date arrives on which the initial sentence would have terminated.