Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sims, 346 So. 2d 664.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Price 650 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Carouthers 607 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Spooner 550 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Byrd 540 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    See, e.g., State v. Jackson, 454 So.2d at 118 ; (La.App.
  • State v. Pugh 536 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Montana 533 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Smith 535 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Johnson 525 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    See, e.g., State v. Jackson, supra ; (La.App.
  • State v. Prince 520 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    State v. Arvie, 505 So.2d at p. 48
  • State v. Hilburn 512 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Arvie 482 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Cross 461 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    [2] in which the court found that a motion to sever made by the state three days prior to trial was timely.
  • State v. Scott 446 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Davis 445 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Hebert 443 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    [1] *623 The trial judge in denying the motion for mistrial stated in part: "I think that there are a number of cases, including State vs. Culberth, ; State vs. Henderson, ; State vs. Simms (sic), ; State vs. Frank, ; State vs. Braxton, , that, in effect, consistently recognized the propriety of the State's commenting on the lact of refuting evidence, or in this case, evidence which was contradicted or uncontradicted, produced by a defendant.
  • State v. Sprinkle 439 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Williams 438 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Triplett 434 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Craddock 435 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Alexander 430 So. 2d 621 La. 1983
    This Court has condoned a trial court ruling which allowed a witness' testimony as to whether the defendant was passive, or not shocked when an armed robber entered the store, and a mother's testimony as to whether the victim was scared of the defendant
  • State v. Moore 414 So. 2d 340 La. 1982
  • State v. Latin 412 So. 2d 1357 La. 1982
  • State v. Coleman 406 So. 2d 563 La. 1981
  • State v. Landry 388 So. 2d 699 La. 1980
  • State v. Jones 381 So. 2d 416 La. 1980
  • State v. Perkins 374 So. 2d 1234 La. 1979
    References made in closing argument that the State's case stands unrebutted or uncontroverted have frequently been upheld by this court, State v. Cryer, 262 La.
  • State v. Mallett 357 So. 2d 1105 La. 1978
  • State Ex Rel. Clark v. Marullo 352 So. 2d 223 La. 1977