DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Schexnayder v. Carpenter, 346 So. 2d 196.

124 citing documents.

  • Brittainey Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Co. 204 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may oh appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. 16 So. 3d 1065 La. 2009
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Randall v. Concordia Nursing Home 965 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Curtis Randall v. Concordia Nursing Home D/B/A Camelot Leisure Living La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “The appropriate procedure for testing whether the jury abused its discretion is to determine whether the award can be supported under the interpretation of the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff which reasonably could have been made by the jury.”
  • Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Desoto Parish School Bd. 907 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • Johnson v. Dickens 702 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Carter v. Baham 683 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Pierce v. Milford 688 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Vincent v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 671 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Bush v. Arrow International 646 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Fleming v. Smith 638 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses *474 an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, (La.
  • LaCombe v. Dr. Walter Olin Moss Reg. Hosp. 617 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Cay v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 614 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Girard v. Price 606 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Hardy v. Delta Downs, Inc. 599 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 590 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Monceaux v. Jennings Rice Drier, Inc. 590 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Lebaron v. Allstate Insurance Co. 572 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • Holliday v. United Services Auto. Ass'n 569 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd. 557 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Fontenot v. Mid-American Casualty Co. 562 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • Davis v. Husqvarna Motor 561 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Rosell v. ESCO 558 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that award may, on appellate review, for articulated reason be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Nastasi v. Fejka 556 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    1977); or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Risk v. State 549 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • Pitts v. Bailes 551 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Williams v. Exxon Corp. 541 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Cage v. Shainberg's Stores of La., supra ; Bevil v. Heath Timber Company, Inc., (La.App.
  • Archie v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. STATE UNIV. 543 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, (La.
  • Fredericks v. Louisiana Farm Bureau 534 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Reck, supra.” Applying these principles to the facts of the present case, we find no abuse of discretion by the jury in its award of $32,-500.00 in general damages for injuries sustained by Mrs. Frederick as a result of the automobile accident in question.
  • Karam v. DeSoto 520 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    * * * * * * "It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Partner v. Anderson 513 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • Thomas v. State Farm Ins. Co. 499 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Lindsay v. Toys 499 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Bonner v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. 494 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Simon v. Hooker Chemical Corp. 489 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    We have examined this record to see if the evidence, when viewed in the interpretation most favorable to Simon, a and we are of the opinion that Simon’s personal and medical facts do not substantiate an award for pain, suffering and disability beyond $350,-000.00.
  • Hefner v. BJ McAdams, Inc. 487 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • Courmier v. Travelers Ins. Co. 486 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Thompson v. Tuggle 486 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • Taylor v. Dupree 484 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • Dobson v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 484 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Pringle v. Williamson Chevrolet, Buick & Pontiac, Inc. 480 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Malmay v. Sizemore 474 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    Wilson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, [ (La.App.
  • Daniels v. Allstate Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Richardson v. Continental Ins. Co. 468 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Tate v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    1977); or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Guillory v. Agee 465 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Horton v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 461 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Norris v. Pool Well Service, Inc. 460 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    Wilson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, supra.
  • Cutchall v. Great American Pump Co. 460 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    Wilson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, supra .