Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Monroe, 345 So. 2d 1185.

46 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Larry West La. 2024
State v. Beaner 974 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Russell 966 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Leonard 915 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
our supreme court modified its previous rulings in response to Professor Pugh's criticism of the earlier decision in State v. Graves, 259 La.
State v. Marston 780 So. 2d 1058 La. 2001
State v. Stacy 665 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
art. 105 because Dr. Reams did not perform the autopsy on either victim.
State v. Martin 607 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Smith 594 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Revere 572 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Cole Oil & Tire Co., Inc. v. Davis 567 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Romero 574 So. 2d 330 La. 1990
State v. Jones 544 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Roberts 541 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Cade 539 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Romero 533 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Baker 528 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
2d 938 (La.1984); and cases cited thereon; (La.
State in Interest of RC 514 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Cotton 511 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Harrison 505 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Guillory 502 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Monroe, this court reaffirmed its original formulation of the business records exception to the hearsay rule: ‘Before the exception may be invoked by the State against the defendant, allowing introduction of a permanent record made in the ordinary course of business from personal knowledge of the facts recorded, or
State v. Carter 490 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. McFadden 476 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
LA. BUSINESS COLLEGE v. Crump 474 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Williams 461 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 105
State v. Vessell 450 So. 2d 938 La. 1984
this court reaffirmed its original formulation of the business records exception to the hearsay rule: Before the exception may be invoked by the State against the defendant, allowing introduction of a permanent record made in the ordinary course of business from personal knowledge of the facts recorded, or
Chaney Oil Co. of Vicksburg v. Beard 446 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Humphrey 445 So. 2d 1155 La. 1984
State v. Donald 440 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Stokes 433 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
State v. Small 427 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Parker 421 So. 2d 834 La. 1982
[6] In Perniciaro, 374 So.2d at 1247 , at 1190 (La.1977) to the effect that [b]efore the exception may be invoked by the State against the defendant, allowing introduction of a permanent record made in the ordinary course of business from personal knowledge of the facts recorded, or from information furnished by one having a business duty to observe and re
State v. Phagans 412 So. 2d 580 La. 1982
this court laid out the applicable foundation for the admission of business records as an exception to the hearsay rule.
State v. Juengain 410 So. 2d 1099 La. 1982
we stated: "* * * Before the exception may be invoked by the State against the defendant, allowing introduction of a permanent record made in the ordinary course of business from personal knowledge of the facts recorded, or from information furnished by one having a business duty to observe and report the f
Newspaper Production Co. v. Perry 404 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Theus, Grisham, Davis & Herlitz Construction Co. v. Clegg Concrete, Inc., (La.App.
State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981
State v. Jones 395 So. 2d 751 La. 1981
State v. Perniciaro, [ ] supra; State v. Monroe, [ ] supra; see Comment, Business Records in Louisiana as an Exception to the Hearsay Rule, 21 La.L.Rev.
Southern Cty. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bryant 385 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
The "business records" exception to the hearsay rule has been recognized as a wherein the court stated that such hearsay exceptions exist where: "` A permanent record made in the ordinary course of business, by a person unavailable for testimony, from personal knowledge of the facts recorded or from information furnished by one having a business duty to observe and report the facts
State v. Johnson 381 So. 2d 436 La. 1980
State v. Foote 379 So. 2d 1058 La. 1980
The documents were admitted as a business records exception to the hearsay rule but there was no showing that the people making the records were unavailable to testify
State v. Vaughn 378 So. 2d 905 La. 1979
we stated: `* * * Before the exception may be invoked by the State against the defendant, allowing introduction of a permanent record made in the ordinary course of business from personal knowledge of the facts recorded, or from information furnished by one having a business duty to observe and report the f
State v. Perniciaro 374 So. 2d 1244 La. 1979
we stated: *1247 "* * * Before the exception may be invoked by the State against the defendant, allowing introduction of a permanent record made in the ordinary course of business from personal knowledge of the facts recorded, or from information furnished by one having a business duty to observe and report
State v. Catanese 368 So. 2d 975 La. 1979
State v. Andrews 369 So. 2d 1049 La. 1979
13:3714; nor any business record exception, were even arguably applicable.
State v. Arbuthnot 367 So. 2d 296 La. 1979
State v. Hayden, 243 La.
State v. Martin 356 So. 2d 1370 La. 1978
State v. Hebert 356 So. 2d 991 La. 1978
Pugh, Louisiana Evidence Law 476-90 (1974).