Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. George, 346 So. 2d 694.

61 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Lanard A. Lavigne La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
289, 70 L.Ed.2d 139 (1981); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Chet K. Whatley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Walker, 204 La.
State v. Whatley 858 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Walker, 204 La.
State v. Rochon 733 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Taylor 525 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Wiggins 518 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
2d 139 (1981); " State v. Butler, supra at 1285 .
State v. Foster 510 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Dennison 482 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Valovich 472 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
“A witness is not in a position to testify affirmatively to the reputation of the accused unless he has heard it discussed.”
State v. Butler 462 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Jackson 450 So. 2d 621 La. 1984
State v. Grigsby 445 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Guillory 438 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Donaldson 439 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
State v. Simpson, 259 La.
State v. Littleton 436 So. 2d 500 La. 1983
State v. Alexander 430 So. 2d 621 La. 1983
1973), or from asking a third party whether the defendant swung the gun as if to pull the trigger
State v. West 419 So. 2d 868 La. 1982
State v. Edwards 419 So. 2d 881 La. 1982
State v. Perry 408 So. 2d 1358 La. 1982
State v. Walker, 204 La.
State v. Jones 408 So. 2d 1285 La. 1982
State v. Mattheson 407 So. 2d 1150 La. 1981
State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981
State v. Garrison 400 So. 2d 874 La. 1981
State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981
State v. Bryan 398 So. 2d 1019 La. 1981
State v. Monroe 397 So. 2d 1258 La. 1981
State v. Motton 395 So. 2d 1337 La. 1981
State v. Brown 395 So. 2d 1301 La. 1981
State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
State v. Harrison, 168 La.
State v. Harris 383 So. 2d 1 La. 1980
State v. Jefferson 379 So. 2d 1389 La. 1980
State v. Prejean 379 So. 2d 240 La. 1980
at 702-3 (La.1977), this court stated: "It is well established that the test of admissibility of allegedly gruesome photographs is whether their probative value outweighs the possible prejudice that may result from their display to the jury.
State v. Eaker 380 So. 2d 19 La. 1980
State v. Murray 375 So. 2d 80 La. 1979
State v. Hatcher 372 So. 2d 1024 La. 1979
State v. Heads 370 So. 2d 564 La. 1979
State v. Dupre 369 So. 2d 1303 La. 1979
State v. Morgan 367 So. 2d 779 La. 1979
15:280; (1975); State v. Polk, 258 La.
State v. Moses 367 So. 2d 800 La. 1979
See, e. g., and decisions there cited.
State v. Washington 367 So. 2d 4 La. 1978
State v. George, La., (1977); State v. Hall, La., (1977).
State v. Williams 366 So. 2d 1365 La. 1978
In State v. George, La., (1977), we stated: "It is generally recognized that a judge's charge must be considered as a whole, and particular expressions construed with reference to the context.
State v. Gomez 365 So. 2d 1313 La. 1978
State v. Valentine 364 So. 2d 595 La. 1978
State v. George, La., (1977); State v. Williams, La., (1977); State v. Cooper, La., (1976).
State v. Webb 364 So. 2d 984 La. 1978
State v. Banks 362 So. 2d 540 La. 1978
State v. Fulmer, 263 La.
State v. Harvey 358 So. 2d 1224 La. 1978
State v. Ferguson 358 So. 2d 1214 La. 1978
State v. Sepulvado 359 So. 2d 137 La. 1978
State v. King, Nos. 60,732 and 60,733