DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McZeal, 352 So. 2d 592.

31 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Davieontray Lee Breaux La. 2025
  • State of Louisiana Versus Tonny J Bauer La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Kentrell D. McElroy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State v. McElroy 241 So. 3d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Serigne 193 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    an alleged October 1974 aggravated rape also was deemed subject to the capital rules of proceeding.
  • State v. Clarkson 48 So. 3d 272 La. 2010
    Const, art. 1, § 17.”) ().
  • State v. GRH 10 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Const. art. 1, § 17: State v. McZeal [, on rehearing, ], supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. G. R. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Const. art. 1, § 17: State v. McZeal [, on rehearing, ], supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Leroy Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    art. 1, § 17: State v. McZeal [, on rehearing, ], supra.
  • State v. Breaux 6 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Const. art 1, § 17: State v. McZeal [, on rehearing, ], supra.
  • State v. Washington 846 So. 2d 723 La. 2003
    (The joinder of aggravated rape and armed robbery would have been proper but for the fact aggravated rape was classified as a capital offense at that time, but armed robbery was not; thus, the joined counts did not satisfy the requirement of being triable by the same mode of trial.)
  • State v. Washington 846 So. 2d 723 La. 2003
    (The joinder of aggravated rape and armed robbery would have been proper but for the fact aggravated rape was classified as a capital offense at that time, but armed robbery was not; thus, the joined counts did not satisfy the requirement of being triable by the same mode of trial.)
  • State v. Simmons 848 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Subsequent to [ State v. ] McZeal, [ ], the federal courts have determined that misjoinder under Rule 8, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, is subject to harmless-error analysis and is not reversible error per se.
  • State v. Patout 812 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    on rehearing (finding federal practice and procedure treatise persuasive).
  • State v. Strickland 683 So. 2d 218 La. 1996
    (Emphasis supplied) (La.
  • State v. Johnson 598 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Adams 525 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Thibodeaux 490 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    State v. McZeal, on rehearing, (La.
  • State v. Defraites 449 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    State v. McZeal, on rehearing, (La.
  • State v. Robertson 441 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 31 La. 1983
    reversed on other grounds on rehearing.
  • State v. Wright 410 So. 2d 1092 La. 1982
  • State v. Williams 410 So. 2d 217 La. 1982
    : "A prospective juror's negative opinions on racial intermarriage and social preferences do not necessarily reflect on his ability to judge fairly and justly, free from prejudice.
  • State v. Jones 396 So. 2d 1272 La. 1981
  • State v. Polk 376 So. 2d 151 La. 1979
  • State v. Rich 368 So. 2d 1083 La. 1979
  • State v. Chapman 367 So. 2d 808 La. 1979
  • State v. Carter 362 So. 2d 510 La. 1978
    In State v. McZeal, on rehearing, the accused was charged in the same indictment with aggravated rape (a capital offense at the time of occurrence) and armed robbery (punishable by confinement necessarily at hard labor).
  • State v. Mallett 357 So. 2d 1105 La. 1978
    State v. McZeal, on rehearing, State v. Peters, on rehearing
  • State v. Donahue 355 So. 2d 247 La. 1978
  • State v. Proctor 354 So. 2d 488 La. 1977
    (La.1977); ; ABA Standards relating to Joinder and Severance, § 2.2(b) and commentary.