Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Shivers, 346 So. 2d 657.

14 citing documents.

State v. Brooks 779 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
3 Cir. 11/30/94), (footnotes omitted), we held: “Any evidence produced as a result of an illegal search and seizure is tainted and thus inadmissible under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.” (citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Fortier 756 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Melbert 649 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
(citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Beals 410 So. 2d 745 La. 1982
1978); State v. Smith, 257 La.
State v. Gould 395 So. 2d 647 La. 1981
State v. Fisher 380 So. 2d 1340 La. 1980
State v. Chopin 372 So. 2d 1222 La. 1979
State v. Jordan 369 So. 2d 1347 La. 1979
407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963)
State v. Wilson 366 So. 2d 1328 La. 1978
See also, opinion by Dixon, J., joined by Calogero, J., and Dennis J., concurring with plurality opinion in that case.
State v. Hatfield 364 So. 2d 578 La. 1978
1978); State v. Smith, 257 La.
State v. Schmidt 359 So. 2d 133 La. 1978
State v. Stewart 357 So. 2d 1111 La. 1978
State v. Dunbar 356 So. 2d 956 La. 1978
State v. Thomas 349 So. 2d 270 La. 1977