DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thomas, 349 So. 2d 270.

50 citing documents.

  • State v. Bass 47 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    citing Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 , 69 S.Ct.
  • State v. Banks 997 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Furgerson 781 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Although mere suspicion cannot justify an arrest, the officer does not need sufficient proof to convict.
  • State v. Richardson 780 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Womack-Grey 764 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Fisher, supra ; State v. Gates, 24,995 (La.App.2d Cir.1/19/94), .
  • State v. Fisher 720 So. 2d 1179 La. 1998
  • State v. Freeman 503 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Colvin 494 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Sterling 479 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    as being factually similar to the case sub judice and as supporting his argument that probable cause did not exist.
  • State v. Farber 446 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Although mere suspicion cannot justify an arrest, the officer does not need sufficient proof to convict.
  • State v. Beck 445 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Mitchell 443 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    State v. Tomasetti, supra
  • State v. LeCompte 441 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    State v. Herbert, supra; (La.
  • State v. Rodrigue 437 So. 2d 830 La. 1983
  • State v. Walker 430 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Chaney 423 So. 2d 1092 La. 1982
  • State v. Serrato 424 So. 2d 214 La. 1982
  • State v. Johnson 422 So. 2d 1125 La. 1982
  • State v. Tokman 412 So. 2d 561 La. 1982
  • State ex rel. Williams 411 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • State v. Leatherwood 411 So. 2d 29 La. 1982
    State v. Ranker, supra .
  • State v. Davis 407 So. 2d 666 La. 1981
  • State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981
  • State v. Nicholas 397 So. 2d 1308 La. 1981
  • State v. Pittman 397 So. 2d 1297 La. 1981
  • State v. Haynie 395 So. 2d 669 La. 1981
    Although mere suspicion cannot justify an arrest, the officer does not need sufficient proof to convict.
  • State v. Nieto 395 So. 2d 733 La. 1981
    this Court sets forth the principles applicable to a warrantless arrest: “A warrantless arrest, no less than an arrest pursuant to a validly issued warrant, must be based on probable cause.
  • State v. Nieto 395 So. 2d 733 La. 1981
    this Court sets forth the principles applicable to a warrantless arrest: "A warrantless arrest, no less than an arrest pursuant to a validly issued warrant, must be based on probable cause.
  • State v. Bell 395 So. 2d 805 La. 1981
  • State v. Brown 395 So. 2d 1301 La. 1981
    Although mere suspicion cannot justify an arrest, the officer does not need sufficient proof to convict.
  • State v. Gould 395 So. 2d 647 La. 1981
    State v. Tomasetti, supra
  • State v. Fauria 393 So. 2d 688 La. 1981
  • State v. Frisch 393 So. 2d 1220 La. 1981
  • State v. Sharp 390 So. 2d 1288 La. 1980
    State v. Tomasetti, supra
  • State v. Mosley 390 So. 2d 1302 La. 1980
    Although mere suspicion cannot justify an arrest, the officer does not need sufficient proof to convict.
  • State v. Scott 389 So. 2d 1285 La. 1980
    " we set forth the applicable principles: 'A warrantless arrest, no less than an arrest pursuant to a validly issued warrant, must be based on probable cause.
  • State v. Bourgeois 388 So. 2d 359 La. 1980
  • State v. Ellender 384 So. 2d 379 La. 1980
  • State v. Tomasetti 381 So. 2d 420 La. 1980
  • State v. Simms 381 So. 2d 472 La. 1980
  • State v. Jackson 380 So. 2d 616 La. 1980
    rural parish of our state, which blazons the words “Sportsman’s Paradise” on its license plates, suspicions may be raised by the possession of a shotgun of a common gauge and shells bearing a major national brand name, loaded with a common size of shot, but “the suspicions aroused are far outweighed by the possibilities of innocent behavior, considering all of the circumstances.”
  • State v. Collins 378 So. 2d 928 La. 1979
    Although mere suspicion cannot justify an arrest, the officer does not need sufficient proof to convict.
  • State v. Mendoza 376 So. 2d 139 La. 1979
  • State v. Hunter 375 So. 2d 99 La. 1979
  • State v. Rudolph 369 So. 2d 1320 La. 1979
    we set forth the principles applicable to warrantless arrests: "A warrantless arrest, no less than an arrest pursuant to a validly issued warrant, must be based on probable cause.
  • State v. Johnson 363 So. 2d 684 La. 1978
    Although mere suspicion cannot justify an arrest, the officer does not need sufficient proof to convict
  • State v. Franklin 353 So. 2d 1315 La. 1977
    we set forth the applicable principles: "A warrantless arrest, no less than an arrest pursuant to a validly issued warrant, must be based on probable cause.
  • State v. Scott 355 So. 2d 231 La. 1977
    we set forth the applicable principles: "A warrantless arrest, no less than an arrest pursuant to a validly issued warrant, must be based on probable cause.
  • State v. Herbert 351 So. 2d 434 La. 1977