Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brent, 347 So. 2d 1112.

26 citing documents.

  • Lanard Lavigne Versus State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
  • State v. Bailey 115 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Rubin 649 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Herrin 562 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Johnson 529 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Burchett 526 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Foster 510 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Zeno 499 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Newman 491 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Lombard 486 So. 2d 106 La. 1986
  • State v. Price 482 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Willis 459 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Baldwin 448 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jones 445 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Willis 438 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    State v. Brumfield, supra
  • State v. Davis 430 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Edwards 420 So. 2d 663 La. 1982
    but distinguish it for the reasons that in the instant case the defendant testified she did not initially point the gun at her husband prior to his cursing her and charging her threatening to kill her.
  • State v. Lewis 416 So. 2d 921 La. 1982
  • State v. Russell 416 So. 2d 1283 La. 1982
  • State v. Jones 408 So. 2d 1285 La. 1982
  • State v. Bodley 394 So. 2d 584 La. 1981
  • State v. Baylis 388 So. 2d 713 La. 1980
  • State v. Smith 369 So. 2d 1300 La. 1979
    relevant to a material issue in the case.” (La.
  • State v. Johnson 365 So. 2d 1267 La. 1978
  • State v. Berain 360 So. 2d 822 La. 1978
    In State v. Brent, La., (1977), we stated: "For purposes of this article, the term `inculpatory statement' refers to defendant's out-of-court admission made after a crime has taken place which implicates defendant in its commission."
  • State v. Denney 352 So. 2d 204 La. 1977
    we made the following explanation of the necessary prerequisites to the introduction of evidence of the victim's character and previous hostile demonstration: *206 Under our statutes and jurisprudence, such evidence is not admissible until defendant has made a showing with appreciable evidence that the