Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Richmond v. Zapata Development Corp., 350 So. 2d 875.
- Daniel J. Saloom, Et Al. v. State Of Louisiana, Department Of Transportation And Development La. 2022
-
Daniel J. Saloom v. State of Louisiana, Dotd
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
7 the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that “a vendee is under no obligation to search the record in order to ascertain what his vendor has sold and what it has not, and the vendee is entitled, as between himself and his vendor, to rely upon his deed as written.” In addition, “When a sale is
-
Ricky J. Matte v. Robert Brown
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
The Court accepted the prior jurisprudence concerning that original defendants/third party plaintiffs’ causes of action and warranty against their vendor (Richmond versus Zapata Development Corp., -89 (La.
-
Matte v. Brown
154 So. 3d 774
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Court accepted the prior jurisprudence concerning that original defendants/third party plaintiffs’ causes of action and warranty against their vendor (Richmond versus Zapata Development Corp., -89 (La.1977)) and failing to pursue the warranty against the third party petitioner’s vendor that the third party claimants herein will not be able to carry their evidentia-ry burden of proving that it was the actions of the third party defendant, Paul Brown, that caused them damages in this matter an
-
Spillman v. Gasco, Inc.
110 So. 3d 150
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
(Emphasis supplied); (La.
- Huckabay v. Keahey 600 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
-
Comb v. Dugas
576 So. 2d 1130
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Having so concluded, the trial court, relying by analogy on our Supreme Court’s concluded that: “...
- Addison v. Thompson 556 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- Besse v. Blossman 521 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- McIlwain v. Manville Forest Products Corp. 499 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
Crawford v. Gray and Associates
493 So. 2d 734
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
The trial court found that defendant Steven Porter was free from negligence, but that defendants Ray Gray and Gray &
-
Sauve Heirs, Inc. v. REYNADU CONST. CO., INC.
441 So. 2d 239
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
The issues are whether plaintiff is precluded from recovering because a levee over a (La.
- Roth v. B & L ENTERPRISES, INC. 420 So. 2d 1094 La. 1982
-
Dunlap v. Red River Waterway Commission
405 So. 2d 655
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
in support of his position.
-
Dillon v. Morgan
362 So. 2d 1130
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
The existence of the Dean servitude was not declared by defendant and was not otherwise *1132