Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gray, 351 So. 2d 448.

53 citing documents.

Lanard Lavigne Versus State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
12 supra, the prosecutor stated in her closing that the defendant was “no longer presumed innocent.”26 In Cole, the appellant argued that prosecutor’s closing argument contained conclusory statements that were not supported by any evidence that was introduced at trial.27 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Cardet Withers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Cody Ficklen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Ficklen 247 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Abbott 222 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 12/4/13), , this court described the law as follows: "An assignment of error based on the refusal of the trial court to grant a new trial on grounds that the verdict was contrary to the law and evidence presents nothing for appellate review.” (La.
State v. Otkins-Victor 193 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
State v. Martin 131 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“An assignment of error based on the refusal of the trial court to grant a new trial on grounds that the verdict was contrary to the law and evidence presents nothing for appellate review.”
State v. Parker 76 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Collins 62 So. 3d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Sherri Ann Sepulvado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Sepulvado 59 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Gardner 844 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
Scott v. American Tobacco Co. 795 So. 2d 1176 La. 2001
For example, the defendant argued the trial court should have excused three jurors because one juror was acquainted with the prosecuting and defense attorneys and was in business with the relative of a prosecuting attorney, one juror was a social friend of the prosecuting attorney and the third juror was the nephew
State v. Winston 723 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Martin 645 So. 2d 190 La. 1994
this court reviewed the defendant's conviction and life sentence for aggravated rape.
State v. Duncan 635 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Guillot, supra, at 1008
State v. Butler 615 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Widenhouse 582 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Wiklund 546 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
defendant argues only that the probative value of S-l was outweighed by the exhibit’s potential prejudicial effect on the jury.
State v. Burge 515 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Seals v. Pittman 499 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
"the mere existence of a *120 personal acquaintance between a prospective juror and the trial participants does not, without more, demonstrate a lack of fitness to serve as a juror."
State v. Roux 487 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Borel 473 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
” , at page 1306 (La.App.
State v. Sepcich 473 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Brown 470 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Clark 437 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Marchese 430 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Stucke 419 So. 2d 939 La. 1982
State v. Marshall 414 So. 2d 684 La. 1982
State v. Huizar 414 So. 2d 741 La. 1982
State v. Tribbet 415 So. 2d 182 La. 1982
State v. Chapman 410 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
State v. Manuel 408 So. 2d 1235 La. 1982
State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 402 So. 2d 678 La. 1981
State v. Morris 397 So. 2d 1237 La. 1981
State v. Nicholas 397 So. 2d 1308 La. 1981
State v. Robinson 386 So. 2d 1374 La. 1980
State v. Davis 385 So. 2d 193 La. 1980
State v. McIntyre 381 So. 2d 408 La. 1980
State v. Sonnier 379 So. 2d 1336 La. 1980
[Citations omitted]" ( State v. Passman, ] 345 So.2d at 880 ) See, also, (La.
State v. Manning 380 So. 2d 54 La. 1980
United States v. Wiman, 304 F.2d 53 (5 Cir. 1962).
State v. Rogers 375 So. 2d 1304 La. 1979
State v. Daniel 378 So. 2d 1361 La. 1979
State v. Huckaby 368 So. 2d 1059 La. 1979
State v. Hammontree 363 So. 2d 1364 La. 1978
where the trial court allowed a nine-year-old rape victim to walk up to defendant and point him out for identification purposes.
State v. Sepulvado 359 So. 2d 137 La. 1978