Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 347 So. 2d 231.
-
State v. Shed
828 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968)
-
State v. Shed
828 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968)
-
State v. Howard
448 So. 2d 713
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
preclude our interpretation of the inadvertency requirement.
- State v. Edsall 385 So. 2d 207 La. 1980
- State v. Lewis 378 So. 2d 396 La. 1979
- State v. Smith 377 So. 2d 1220 La. 1979
-
State v. Wilkerson
367 So. 2d 319
La. 1979
n. Even if the deputy believed the defendant had stolen items from Mr. Bohall's brother (as pointed out above, the only information received on this subject was that defendant's roommate had stolen those items), there was no reason to believe they were in the defendant's luggage or, if they were, or moved ().
-
State v. Carter
363 So. 2d 893
La. 1978
992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968); State v. Williams, La., (1977); State v. Meichel, La., (1974).
- State v. Colvin 358 So. 2d 1250 La. 1978
-
State v. Braud
357 So. 2d 545
La. 1978
992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968)
-
State v. Dunbar
356 So. 2d 956
La. 1978
992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968)
- State v. Schouest 351 So. 2d 462 La. 1977
-
State v. Hutchinson
349 So. 2d 1252
La. 1977
1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970)