Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 347 So. 2d 231.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Shed 828 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968)
  • State v. Shed 828 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968)
  • State v. Howard 448 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    preclude our interpretation of the inadvertency requirement.
  • State v. Edsall 385 So. 2d 207 La. 1980
  • State v. Lewis 378 So. 2d 396 La. 1979
  • State v. Smith 377 So. 2d 1220 La. 1979
  • State v. Wilkerson 367 So. 2d 319 La. 1979
    n. Even if the deputy believed the defendant had stolen items from Mr. Bohall's brother (as pointed out above, the only information received on this subject was that defendant's roommate had stolen those items), there was no reason to believe they were in the defendant's luggage or, if they were, or moved ().
  • State v. Carter 363 So. 2d 893 La. 1978
    992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968); State v. Williams, La., (1977); State v. Meichel, La., (1974).
  • State v. Colvin 358 So. 2d 1250 La. 1978
  • State v. Braud 357 So. 2d 545 La. 1978
    992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968)
  • State v. Dunbar 356 So. 2d 956 La. 1978
    992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968)
  • State v. Schouest 351 So. 2d 462 La. 1977
  • State v. Hutchinson 349 So. 2d 1252 La. 1977
    1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970)