Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Spears, 350 So. 2d 603.

50 citing documents.

State v. Holden 83 So. 3d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Carter 987 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Jackson 724 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Galliano 655 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
844 and 920, , 605 n. 1 (La.1977), this court did not consider six additional arguments made by defendant in his appellate brief (under the headings of assignments one, two, four, five, six and eleven), which were neither properly designated assignments of error nor errors patent on the face of the record.
State v. Cortina 632 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Williams 633 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Daniels 628 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Hattaway 621 So. 2d 796 La. 1993
See, State v. Huntley, supra; State v. Lawrence, supra; (La.
State v. Folse 623 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Riley 613 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
art. 920; , 605 n. 1 (La.1977)
State v. Battieste 597 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Lee 577 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. James 569 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Schaub 563 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Longo 560 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Rodriguez 554 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Bland 558 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Jack 554 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Johnson 552 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Collins 546 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Thomas 540 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Ferguson 540 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Chaney 537 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
605 n. 1 (La.1977); (La.
State v. Riley 532 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Spears 525 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Garcia 519 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Finley 520 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Bennett 517 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Cupit 508 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Banks 503 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Thorne 503 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
An assignment of error appearing for the first time in a brief cannot be considered on appeal unless the matter falls into the category of an “error patent.” (La.App.
State v. Pautard 470 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Cross 461 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
footnote No. 1 (La.1977), as follows: Defendant's allegations of error are not embodied in a formal assignment of error.
State v. Lively 457 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Kelly 453 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Stewart 453 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Laddin 449 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Except for ‘patent error’, the reviewing court may consider only errors so designated, [citation omitted].”
State v. Kirts 447 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Brown 445 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
holds that this matter is not properly before the court for review, we will consider it here.
State v. Bridges 444 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Sonnier 441 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
State v. Melbert 438 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Thomas 406 So. 2d 1325 La. 1981
1974, art. 1, § 13; (Tate and Dennis, JJ., concurring); (Calogero, J., concurring); Hargrave, The Declaration of Rights of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, 1, 46 (1974), if the police officers are not informed and have no knowledge that counsel has been retained or appointed, there is no requirement that the line-up be delayed or postponed.
State v. Spell 399 So. 2d 551 La. 1981
State v. Jackson 380 So. 2d 616 La. 1980
From the three assignments argued in brief our attention is drawn to that which pertains to the adequacy of the application for the search warrant, a matter which can be reviewed by inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and thus within the scope of the rule we have adopted by analogy from Article 920
State v. Vaughn 378 So. 2d 905 La. 1979
concurring); (Calogero, J. concurring)...."
State Ex Rel. Fields v. Maggio 368 So. 2d 1016 La. 1979
concurring); (Calogero, J. concurring).
State v. Lozan 359 So. 2d 108 La. 1978
State v. King 355 So. 2d 1305 La. 1978
State v. Provost 352 So. 2d 661 La. 1977