Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Schouest, 351 So. 2d 462.

40 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Mitchell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
the prosecutor asked prospective jurors: “After you sit through this trial and after you listen to all of the evidence, and if after that we convince you beyond a reasonable doubt that Nolan Schouest is guilty, would you vote guilty in this case?” The defendant‟s objection to the question was based upon
State v. Mitchell 125 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the prosecutor asked prospective jurors: “ ‘After you sit through this trial and after you listen to all of the evidence, and if after that we convince you beyond a reasonable doubt that Nolan Schouest is guilty, would you vote guilty in this case?’ ” The defendant’s objection to the question was based upon
State v. Gray 101 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
are not conducting a search under the Fourth |1fiAmendment,”) (); see also, State v. Young, 39,546 (La.App.
State v. Taylor 97 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Vargas 66 So. 3d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1529 , 55 *38 L.Ed.2d 543 (1978)
State v. Linn 975 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Young, 39,546 (La.App.
State v. Young 895 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
Similarly, where the trial court overruled defendant's objection that the prosecutor asked prospective jurors whether they "would" convict under certain circumstances, this Court held that there was no error because the prosecutor was simply reminding the jury of its sworn duty.
State v. Minnifield 727 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Gaudet 638 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Hill 618 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Noto 596 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Cassell 540 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Taylor 525 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Zone 511 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
1529 , 55 L.Ed.2d 543 (1978)
State v. Rovira 483 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Ray 471 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Morgan 459 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
asked a prospective juror on voir dire if he would vote guilty if *9 the prosecution convinced him beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty.
State v. Hocum 456 So. 2d 602 La. 1984
State v. Patterson 432 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Oh v. Allstate Ins. Co. 428 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Johnson 426 So. 2d 95 La. 1983
State v. Howard, 262 La.
State v. Yarbrough 418 So. 2d 503 La. 1982
State v. Stephenson 412 So. 2d 553 La. 1982
State v. Williams 397 So. 2d 1287 La. 1981
State v. Williams 386 So. 2d 1342 La. 1980
State v. Simms, No. 65,582
State v. Robinson 386 So. 2d 1374 La. 1980
State v. Carthan 377 So. 2d 308 La. 1979
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
State v. Murray 375 So. 2d 80 La. 1979
*87 (La.1977); (on rehearing); State v. Howard, 262 La.
State v. Catanese 368 So. 2d 975 La. 1979
Creadeur v. Department of Public Safety 364 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
State v. Wagster 361 So. 2d 849 La. 1978
(No. 60,634 on the docket of this Court, rendered March 6, 1978)
State v. King 355 So. 2d 1305 La. 1978
State v. Cass 356 So. 2d 936 La. 1977
State v. Cass 356 So. 2d 396 La. 1977
handed down October 10, 1977.
State v. Vinet 352 So. 2d 684 La. 1977
(1972); McCormick on Evidence, § 207 (2d ed. 1972); Annotation, Physiological or Psychological Truth and Deception Tests, 23 A.L.R.2d 1306 .
State v. Tennant 352 So. 2d 629 La. 1977
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); decided October 10, 1977.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by