Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cobbs, 350 So. 2d 168.
-
State v. Klein
252 So. 3d 973
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
757 (1925) ; *982 ; State v. Cobbs
- State of Louisiana v. Eshom v. Ashworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
- State v. Ashworth 178 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State v. Turner 82 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
- State v. Morrison 55 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- State of Louisiana v. Kenneth E. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- State v. McLeod 843 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- State v. Alcazar 784 So. 2d 1276 La. 2001
- State v. Jenkins 764 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- State v. Sterling 759 So. 2d 60 La. 2000
- State v. Diggs 715 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
-
State v. Bertoniere
685 So. 2d 202
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: The object of the description in a search warrant is to prevent the search of the wrong premises.
- State v. Williams 617 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- State v. Roy 606 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- State v. Regan 601 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- State v. Fann 597 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- State v. Voorhies 590 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. Johnson 580 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. Mitchell 580 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. Stanfield 562 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- State v. Johnson 558 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- State v. Salatich 548 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
- State v. Holland 544 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Isaac 544 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
- State v. Tassin 536 So. 2d 402 La. 1988
-
State v. Garantine
527 So. 2d 1144
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
: “If the place to be searched is described in sufficient detail to enable the officers to locate it with reasonable certainty and with the reasonable probability that the police will not search the wrong premises, the description is sufficient.” *1146 The burden of showing that the municipal address pro
- State v. Lee 526 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
-
State v. Oliver
526 So. 2d 395
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Furthermore, it has been held that enhanced penalties imposed under LSA-15:529.1 do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment, nor are the statutory minimum sentences under the multiple bill considered excessive.
- State v. Rogers 519 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- State v. Hupp 514 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
- State v. Brian 502 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
-
State v. Guillory
502 So. 2d 258
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
” We find no error in the trial judge’s decision to accept the testimony of the police officer, rather than the self-serving testimony of the defendant.
- State v. Toussaint 502 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Miller 495 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Distinguished State v. Martin 487 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- State v. Alexander 487 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- State v. Franks 483 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
State v. Ockman
466 So. 2d 658
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
wherein the court stated: The object of the description in a search warrant is to prevent the search of the wrong premises.
- State v. Simms 465 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
- State v. Becnel 463 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State in Interest of Johnson 461 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. LaFleur 461 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Brooms 453 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Vessell 450 So. 2d 938 La. 1984
- State v. Bailey 446 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Harris 444 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Whorton 440 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Ventry
439 So. 2d 1144
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
: The object of the description in a search warrant is to prevent the search of the wrong premises.
- State v. Montegut 439 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983