Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kellogg, 350 So. 2d 656.

13 citing documents.

State v. Landrieu 274 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Bowens 871 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the defendant's conviction after the trial court sustained an objection by the state to defense counsel's attempt to question the two victims about a civil suit they had filed against the defendant arising out of the incident in question.
State v. Quatrevingt 670 So. 2d 197 La. 1996
State v. Berry 645 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
our supreme court held that where evidence of the existence of a lawsuit may tend to show interest or bias, it is evidence which the jury is entitled to consider, particularly where there is a close factual dispute and a limited number of eye witnesses: Our jurisprudence permits full cross-examination
State v. Quatrevingt 617 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
[15] the Court stated: Our jurisprudence permits full cross-examination in order to expose any bias or interest of the witness which might influence his perceptions or color his testimony.
State v. Creel 508 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Jenkins 456 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Pettaway 450 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
[ where the victim and his wife had filed suit against the defendant arising out of the incident which formed the basis of the charge for which the defendant was tried.]
State v. Palmer 447 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
15:492 that his right to full cross examination allows him to question this witness regarding the aforementioned civil suit.
State v. Trosclair 443 So. 2d 1098 La. 1983
1105 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974)
State v. Hillard 421 So. 2d 220 La. 1982
State v. Daniel 378 So. 2d 1361 La. 1979
Section 492 of Title 15 are cited in support of the defense contention.
State v. DeCuir 364 So. 2d 946 La. 1978
cert, denied, 429 U.S. 833 , 97 S.Ct.