Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davies, 350 So. 2d 586.

94 citing documents.

State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Toups 833 So. 2d 910 La. 2002
(evidence of flight, concealment, and attempt to avoid apprehension indicate consciousness of guilt and is one of the circumstances from which the jury may infer guilt); State v. Wade, 33,121 (La.App.
State v. Murray 827 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Thompson, 33 ,204 (La.App.2d Cir.3/01/00), .
State v. Sewell 811 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Ratliff, 35,144 (La.App.2d Cir.9/26/01), ; State v. Thompson, 33 ,204 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/00), ; (La.App.
State v. Williams 802 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Ratliff 796 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Thompson, 33 ,204 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/00), ; (La.App.
State v. Jones 792 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Lewis 793 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Furgerson 781 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Daniels, supra ; State v. Thompson, 33 ,058 (La.App.2d Cir.4/7/00), .
State v. Ashley 768 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Watkins 768 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Watkins 768 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hudson 760 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. *980 Daniels, (La.App.
State v. James 754 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Thompson 754 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Robinson 754 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hamilton 747 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Thomas 745 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Postell 735 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Emerson 722 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Powell, 28,788 (La.
State v. Berry 684 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Bordenave 678 So. 2d 19 La. 1996
State v. Jones 657 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Jones 657 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Smith 651 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Broussard 649 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Additionally, Louisiana courts have admitted evidence of criminal acts of the accused constituting admissions of guilt by conduct wherein the defendant acts to obstruct justice or avoid punishment for the current crime with which he is charged: [5] ; [6] ; [7] .
State v. Daniels 614 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Bellamy 599 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Lott 535 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Pravata 522 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Williams 500 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Sampson 480 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Washington 430 So. 2d 641 La. 1983
State v. Washington 430 So. 2d 641 La. 1983
State v. Fuller 418 So. 2d 591 La. 1982
State v. Wilkerson 403 So. 2d 652 La. 1981
this Court stated: "Evidence of flight, concealment, and attempt to avoid apprehension is relevant.
State v. Molinario 383 So. 2d 345 La. 1980
We conclude therefore that defendant's flight from the state was relevant to show his consciousness of guilt, and that the probative value of this evidence outweighed its prejudicial effect.
State v. McIntyre 381 So. 2d 408 La. 1980
State v. Simmons 357 So. 2d 517 La. 1978
See *519 and the cases cited there.
State v. Bolton 354 So. 2d 517 La. 1978
State v. Bryant 351 So. 2d 1188 La. 1977
Recently, in State v. Davies, La., (1977), we stated: "Evidence of flight, concealment, and attempt to avoid apprehension is relevant.