Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mashburn v. Collin, 355 So. 2d 879.

137 citing documents.

Holmes v. St. Charles General Hosp. 465 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Sosa v. Chandler Machine Co. 459 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Cajun Contractors & Engineers Inc. 459 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Bank of New Orleans v. Monco Agency, Inc. 457 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
993 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962)
Wattigny v. Lambert 453 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Concrete Post-Tensioning v. Armco, Inc. 449 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Ronquille v. Martin 449 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., and Acme Refrigeration of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Caljoan, Inc.
Capital Bank & Trust Co. v. Wall 448 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Gaudet v. Crochet 448 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Richard v. Weill Const. Co., Inc. 446 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
993 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962)
Health Unlimited v. Loyola University 434 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Indus. Sand and Abrasives v. L. & NR Co. 427 So. 2d 1152 La. 1983
Burke v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. of Cal. 427 So. 2d 1165 La. 1983
Rochon v. Wolter 427 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1981); Duvalle v. Lake Kenilworth, Inc.
Dupont v. Pendley 424 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
In Cangelosi v. Schwegmann Bros., Etc., the following guidelines for an action in defamation are set forth: “To maintain an action in defamation, the following elements must be shown: (1) defamatory words; (2) publication; (3) falsity; (4) malice, actual or implied; and (5) resulting injury.” the court said: “A motion for summary judgment should be granted where it is shown that no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a *1237 matter of law.
Foote v. Sarafyan 432 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
It is at best a case of harsh opinion on truth, and mere harsh opinion does not result in liability for defamation; , 96 ALR3d 590 (La.1977).
Rood v. Finney 418 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Hebert v. Vice 413 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Meyers v. Gulf Ins. Co. 413 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Norton v. Thorne 412 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
3rd Cir. 1980), we discussed the applicable law regarding motions for summary judgment: “ the Louisiana Supreme Court stated, at page 890: “...
Pasqua v. LaFourche Parish School Bd. 408 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Klohn v. Louisiana Power & Light 406 So. 2d 577 La. 1981
Wattigny v. Lambert 408 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
*1130 The Louisiana Supreme Court, had before it a defamation action brought by the owner of a restaurant against the author of a newspaper column.
Traylor v. Shell Oil Co. 400 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Cates v. Beauregard Electric Corporation, Inc., (La.
White v. Baker Manor Nursing Home, Inc. 400 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Vermilion Corp. v. Vaughn 397 So. 2d 490 La. 1981
993 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962)
Duvalle v. Lake Kenilworth, Inc. 396 So. 2d 1268 La. 1981
McHale v. Lake Charles American Press 390 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Comparatively, a to be an opinion.
Vermilion Corp. v. Vaughn 387 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Holiday City Builders, Inc. v. Acadian Aviation Corp. 386 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Joiner v. Weeks 383 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Melancon v. Durand 378 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(5) Affidavits submitted Shall be made on personal knowledge.”
Jaubert v. Crowley Post-Signal, Inc. 375 So. 2d 1386 La. 1979
[5] It should be noted, however, that "[s]ince the (United States) Supreme Court decisions from New York Times through Gertz and Firestone establish only minimum safeguards for the freedom of speech and the freedom of press under the First Amendment, it is permissible and perhaps appropriate for a state to grant broader protection of
Domino v. Striplen 366 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
stated at pages 890-891: “In cases affecting the exercise of First Amendment liberties, proper summary judgment procedure is essential.
Barnes v. Sun Oil Co. 362 So. 2d 761 La. 1978
Economy Carpets v. Better Business Bureau 361 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
When this matter was tried
Kidder v. Anderson 354 So. 2d 1306 La. 1978
es desired by the people'" and that "`The maintenance of the opportunity for free political discussion to the end that government may be responsive to the will of the people and that changes may be obtained by lawful means, an opportunity essential to the security of the Republic, is a fundamental principle of our constitutional system.'" (La.