DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Holstead, 354 So. 2d 493.

76 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Cooper, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Manuel Dukes La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
    The Supreme Court in Interiano defines a lewd or lascivious act as one that is “lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual 13 relations, and relating to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.” Interiano, 2003-1760 at 7, 868 So.2d at 15, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Teddy Aguillard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Aguillard 242 So. 3d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    2/13/04), , 15 ; State v. Holstead , , 498 (La.1977).
  • State of Louisiana v. Fahim A. Shaikh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Shaikh 188 So. 3d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Lewd and lascivious has been defined as “ ‘an act upon the person of a juvenile which is lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and relating to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.’ ” State v. Interiano, 03-1760, p. 7 (La.2/13/04), ().
  • State v. J.M. 189 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Stec , 99-633 at p. 6, 749 So.2d at 787 ; -98 (La.1977).
  • State v. Alverez 158 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. E.J.M. 119 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 11/30/99), ; -498 (La.1977).
  • State v. Davis 108 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Interiano, 2003-1760 (La.2/13/04), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Tracy Wayne Bowie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Avis Renea Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Bowie 101 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    rmined that the statute “provides fair notice that the defendant ‘is charged with having done an act upon the person of a juvenile which |9is lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and relating to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.’ ” State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04), ().
  • State v. Trahan 101 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    ed that the statute “provides fair notice that the defendant ‘is charged with having done an act upon the person of a juvenile which is lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and relating to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.’ ” State v. Interiano, 03-1760, p. 7 (La.2/13/04), ().
  • State v. Jones 74 So. 3d 197 La. 2011
    14:81(A) as an act which is "lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and relating to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.” State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04), ; (La.
  • State v. Whitmore 58 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    4 See State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.02/13/04), ; State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. A.B.M., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State v. A.B.M. 52 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. M. L. Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State v. ML JR. 35 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Todd Andrew Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State v. Jones 32 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State v. Redfearn 22 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Cloud, 2006-877 (La.App.
  • State v. Schaller 15 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See also, State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04)
  • State of Louisiana v. Lee Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State v. Vidrine 9 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State v. Caston 996 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Robinson 975 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State v. Robinson 975 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul D. Massey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Delaney 965 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Samuel Delaney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. W.D.F., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2/13/04), the supreme court discussed the meaning of lewd and lascivious as follows: In [State v.] Holstead, [-98 (La.1977),] this court reaffirmed its prior jurisprudence that the statute provides fair notice that the defendant “is charged with having done an act upon the person of a juvenile which is lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and rel
  • State of Louisiana v. Tommy Cloud La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State v. Cloud 946 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Lande 934 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 11/30/99) , , -498 (La.1977).
  • State v. Houston 925 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Samuel Glenn Teague La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    2/13/04), the supreme court discussed the meaning of lewd and lascivious as follows: In [State v.] Holstead, [-98 (La.1977)] this court reaffirmed its prior jurisprudence that the statute provides fair notice that the defendant “is charged with having done an act upon the person of a juvenile which is lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals
  • State v. Teague 893 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04), , the supreme court discussed the meaning of lewd and lascivious as follows: In [ State v. ] Holstead, [ -98 (La.1977)] this court reaffirmed its prior jurisprudence that the statute provides fair notice that the defendant "is charged with having done an act upon the person of a juvenile which is lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and relating to sexual impurity
  • State v. Ellis 880 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    In State v. Interiano, supra at 15 , -98 (La.1977), in which the supreme court reaffirmed that La.
  • State v. Interiano 868 So. 2d 9 La. 2004
  • State v. Gaspard 841 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    App. 4th Cir.1991) ( State v. Prejean, 216 La.
  • State v. Noil 807 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Roberts 796 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Stec 749 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Pomeroy 713 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Sturdivant 669 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Flores 669 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. Free, 26,267 (La.App.