DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rey, 351 So. 2d 489.

57 citing documents.

  • State v. Jackson 272 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
  • State v. Tate 203 So. 3d 1041 La. 2016
    Because Uthese distorted statements constitute a fraud upon the courts and represent impermissible overreaching by the government, a warrant based on an affidavit containing intentional misrepresentations must be quashed.” (La.
  • State v. Smith 152 So. 3d 218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    492 n. 1 (La.1977); State v. Peterson, supra.
  • State v. Robertson 134 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Williams 53 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Peterson 868 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Rando 848 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. McBride 773 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that Article 723 represents a codification of the work product privilege.
  • State v. Hoffpauir 731 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    In State v. Page , 95-2401 pp. 13-14, 680 So.2d at 710 , this court discussed intentional misrepresentations in a warrant: -492 (La.1977), the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the approach to be taken when reviewing an application for a search warrant based on a complaint of intentional misrepresentations or inaccurate statements.
  • State v. Page 680 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    -492 (La.1977), the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the approach to be taken when reviewing an application for a search warrant based on a complaint of intentional misrepresentations or inaccurate statements.
  • State v. Neisler 666 So. 2d 1064 La. 1996
    in which this court upheld a search warrant, despite inaccurate information in the affidavit, because the remainder of the affidavit after excision of the unintentional misrepresentations still established probable cause.
  • State v. Solomon 664 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    In their writ application to the Louisiana Supreme Court
  • State v. Smith 663 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. McLemore 640 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Neisler 635 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Barrilleaux 620 So. 2d 1317 La. 1993
  • State v. Byrd 568 So. 2d 554 La. 1990
  • State v. Mayes 532 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “[W]hen faced with an affidavit containing inaccurate statements the preferred approach is to excise the inaccurate statements and then examine the residue to determine if it supports a finding of probable cause.
  • State v. Lee 524 So. 2d 1176 La. 1988
  • State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    When unintentionally false statements are included in the affidavit supporting the issuance of a search warrant, (La.
  • State v. Hudgins 519 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Shrader 514 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Smith 473 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Such a misrepresentation, appellant contends, constitutes a fraud upon the courts, and U.S. v. Thomas, 489 F.2d 664 , a federal Fifth Circuit decision.
  • State v. Taylor 468 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Richmond 464 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Howard 448 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 448 So. 2d 659 La. 1984
  • State v. Westfall 446 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Morris 444 So. 2d 1200 La. 1984
    (inadvertent material misstatements, rather than omissions, in search warrant affidavit at issue).
  • State v. Lingle 436 So. 2d 456 La. 1983
  • State v. Mann 431 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    State v. Krolowitz, supra
  • State v. Zamora 430 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    State v. Caldwell, supra
  • State v. Patterson 422 So. 2d 1131 La. 1982
  • State v. Brannon 414 So. 2d 335 La. 1982
  • State v. Feeback 411 So. 2d 10 La. 1982
  • State v. Krolowitz 407 So. 2d 1175 La. 1981
  • State v. Morstein 404 So. 2d 916 La. 1981
  • State v. Johnson 404 So. 2d 239 La. 1981
  • State v. Lehnen 403 So. 2d 683 La. 1981
  • State v. Smith 397 So. 2d 1326 La. 1981
    is the seminal Louisiana case on the effects of misrepresentation in the search warrant affidavit.
  • State v. Ogden 391 So. 2d 434 La. 1980
  • State v. Caldwell 384 So. 2d 431 La. 1980
    this court stated that when there is unintentional inclusion of incorrect information in a search warrant's supporting affidavit: "...
  • State v. Paster 373 So. 2d 170 La. 1979
  • State v. White 368 So. 2d 1000 La. 1979
    and the approach taken by this Court to inaccurate statements in affidavits.
  • State v. Huckaby 368 So. 2d 1059 La. 1979
    Defendant, however, asserts that the evidence seized pursuant to the warrant must nevertheless be suppressed because the affidavit contains deliberate misrepresentations made by the affiant.
  • State v. McGraw 366 So. 2d 1278 La. 1979
    handed down October 10, 1977, the Court again found no merit in defendant's complaint that he had not been given the lists because: `In the present case, the record indicates that the prosecutor assembled his information on the voting records of prospective jurors from the records in the office of the clerk of court
  • State v. Koncir 367 So. 2d 365 La. 1979
  • State v. Hysell 364 So. 2d 1300 La. 1978
    adopted the approach taken by the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Thomas, 489 F.2d 664 (5th Cir. 1973) to determine whether probable cause exists when there are inaccurate statements in the affidavit supporting the warrant.