Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Madere, 352 So. 2d 666.
-
State of Louisiana v. Martin G. Lemoine
222 So. 3d 688
La. 2017
2003), (title of an act “may be instructive in determining legislative intent”); (La.
- Adler v. Williams 203 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
Maw Enterprises, L.L.C. v. City of Marksville
149 So. 3d 210
La. 2014
See MAW Enterprises, 13-456 at 3, 128 So.3d at 581 (Peters, J., dissents); (noting that the title of an act, while not part of the statute, may be used to determine legislative intent).
-
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Cardenas, III
145 So. 3d 362
La. 2014
The title of an act “may be instructive in determining legislative intent.” Authement v. Shappert Engineering, 02-1631, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), ; (same).
- State v. Williams 60 So. 3d 1189 La. 2011
- State v. Holmes 811 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Jordan 774 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
- State v. Ste. Marie 704 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
- State v. Deville 701 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
- State ex rel. Ieyoub v. Phipps 634 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
Jordan v. Intercontinental Bulktank Corp.
621 So. 2d 1141
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
See Rule 1-3, Uniform RulesCourts of Appeal; State v. *1157 Madere, (La.App.
-
Louisiana Associated Gen. Contr. v. Calcasieu
586 So. 2d 1354
La. 1991
Co., , 614 n. 6 (La.1990)
-
Green v. Louisiana Underwriters Ins. Co.
571 So. 2d 610
La. 1990
Melancon v. Mizell, 216 La.
-
State v. Mobley
568 So. 2d 1368
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Javeler Construction Company, (La.App.
- Winston v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 545 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- Ermert v. Hartford Ins. Co. 531 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- Davis v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 469 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
- Dent v. DEPT. OF CORR., HUNT CORR. CENTER 460 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- In Re Hamilton 446 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Henry 443 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
-
Succession of Dupree v. Miller
433 So. 2d 372
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
3 Cir.1982), writs denied, , 376 (La.1982); and
- Shop-A-Lott, Inc. v. Town of Many 427 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Ryals v. Home Ins. Co. 410 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Pratt v. State 408 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
- Brown v. STATE, ETC. 392 So. 2d 415 La. 1980
- Herndon v. Herndon 388 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
-
Brown v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety, Division of Louisiana State Police
385 So. 2d 436
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
the Louisiana Supreme Court held the above statute mandated the summary seizure and destruction of slot machines and other “gambling devices” without regard to whether they were used to conduct gambling.
- Quiett v. Estate of Moore 378 So. 2d 362 La. 1980