Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Halcomb v. Halcomb, 352 So. 2d 1013.

99 citing documents.

Cabaniss v. Courrege 482 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Palmer v. Palmer 476 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
In view of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s and White v. Morris, 236 La.
Eiermann v. Eiermann 477 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Supreme Court held that a parent could not unilaterally reduce his child support payments by a proportionate amount because one of the children reached the age of majority.
Johnston v. Johnston 469 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hendrix v. Hendrix 457 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Martin v. Martin 457 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Dooley v. Dooley 443 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Bagby v. Dillon 434 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Dubroc noted, at page 379, (La.
Flynn v. Flynn 434 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Martin v. Martin 433 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Vallaire v. Vallaire 433 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Weatherspoon v. Weatherspoon 433 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Melancon v. Neary 428 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Thompson v. Thompson 428 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
McManus v. McManus 428 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Seifert v. Seifert, supra
Ramos v. Ramos 425 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Townsend v. Townsend 421 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Folds v. Lebert 420 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
to authorize an extrajudicial reduction of child support payments where the facts showed that the child was being supported directly by the father with whom the child took up residence after the amount of support was set.
Mathews v. Mathews 415 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Matter of Andras 410 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
McGovern v. Tatman 410 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
at 1015-1016: “Although not necessarily exclusive, an acceptable procedure for reduction or modification is to proceed by contradictory motion to have the amount of future alimony reduced, modified or terminated.
Wilkerson v. Indovina 405 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Bertrand v. Bertrand 401 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
He recognized that the father was not obliged by law to support the two sons after they became majors, (La.
Reed v. Reed 399 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
The trial judge, and other cases, ruled that evidence of such agreements was impermissible and that only the court could change the judgment.
Lachney v. Lachney 399 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
In the year 1977 appeared to re-affirm the principle that a judgment awarding alimony is not subject to alteration or modification absent a suit for modification by the party against whom the judgment had been rendered.
Pierce v. Pierce 397 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
The First Circuit reasoned that a party in whose favor a judgment is rendered may waive rights under the judgment, Succession of Mioton, 201 La.
Lewis v. Lewis 395 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
when it stated on page 1016 that: “...
Walker v. Walker 395 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Dauzat v. Dauzat 391 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
The trial judge, gave the mother judgment for the unpaid child support.
Howell v. Howell 391 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Moga [Dubroc] v. Dubroc, (La.
Marshall v. Marshall 390 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Dubroc v. Dubroc 388 So. 2d 377 La. 1980
Supporting its holding, which the trial judge relied upon, stating that Halcomb involved unilateral action by the husband in reducing his support payments.
Perkins v. Perkins 388 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Dubroc v. Dubroc 380 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Blankenship v. Blankenship 382 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Bordelon v. Bordelon 380 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Sizeler v. Sizeler 375 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
citing language from Pisciotto v. Crucia, 224 La.
Seifert v. Seifert 374 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
In re Adoption of Jarreau 373 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Bruner v. Bruner 373 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
1016 , (La.1977): "Reduction of or discharge from a judgment condemning one to pay alimony must therefore be sued for by the party against whom the judgment was rendered.
James v. Spears 372 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Cowen v. Cowen 375 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Wilson v. Wilson 365 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
and at p. 1017 stated: “We agree that the wife may no longer institute original proceedings for the support of a child over whom she had custody after the child has reached majority; nor can she seek an increase of an award for the child’s future support after the child has reached majority.
McClure v. McClure 363 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
In speaking to the binding effect of a judgment awarding alimony and/or child support and its inviolability to alteration or change without judicial intervention, stated: ".
Suire v. Miller 363 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Vernon v. Leger 363 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
a child support case, the Louisiana Supreme Court, in quoting Pisciotto v. Crucia, 224 La.
Dolhonde v. Dolhonde 357 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
ON REHEARING We granted a rehearing herein on motion of Appellee, Linda Lynch Dolhonde, on our decision rendered herein November 21, 1977, holding that Appellee lacked procedural capacity to sue for past due alimony owed for the support of Appellee's minor child whose custody had been awarded to Appellee.
Almond v. Almond 357 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
the Supreme Court held that reduction of or discharge from a judgment condemning one to pay alimony must be sued for by the party against whom the judgment was rendered and therefore the husband who is condemned to pay child support has no right to proportionately reduce the in globo award in favor of the c
Wisdom v. Wisdom 356 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
Wallace v. Wallace, supra.