Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Proctor, 354 So. 2d 488.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lee Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Guillory 61 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Grillette 588 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. James 545 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Piazza 478 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
ASSIGNMENT NO. 2 Appellant says he was prejudiced by a : “Some of the dangers inherent in a multiple offense joinder situation are that the jury may become confused in trying to apply the applicable law and evidence to the correct offense; that the jury may consider that a person charged with doing so many things is a bad man who must have done something, a feeli
State v. Horton 458 So. 2d 445 La. 1984
State v. Harris 383 So. 2d 1 La. 1980
State v. Spencer 374 So. 2d 1195 La. 1979
State v. Lecompte 371 So. 2d 239 La. 1979
State v. Coleman 369 So. 2d 1286 La. 1979
State v. Terriault 369 So. 2d 125 La. 1979
1975) and held that no technical objection is required to preserve the issue of excessiveness for appellate review provided the issue is raised by assignment of error in connection with the appeal.
State v. Cox 369 So. 2d 118 La. 1979
[3] See also the progeny of the Williams decisions, likewise overruled as to this holding:
State v. Hamilton 364 So. 2d 585 La. 1978
State v. Procell 365 So. 2d 484 La. 1978
State v. Carter 362 So. 2d 510 La. 1978
State v. Lewis 358 So. 2d 1285 La. 1978
State v. Labostrie 358 So. 2d 1243 La. 1978
State v. Nelson 357 So. 2d 1100 La. 1978
State v. Western 355 So. 2d 1314 La. 1978
See State v. Proctor, La., (1977).
State v. Williams 355 So. 2d 1291 La. 1978
No. 59,809; ABA Standards on Joinder and Severance, § 2.2(b), p. 33.
State v. Mitchell 356 So. 2d 974 La. 1978
State v. Holstead 354 So. 2d 493 La. 1977