Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hills, 354 So. 2d 186.

97 citing documents.

State v. Jones 840 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Murray 827 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Roddy, 33,112 (La.
State v. Johnson 821 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Roddy, 33,112 (La.
State v. Loyd 810 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Roddy (La.App.2d Cir.04/07/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.05/11/01), ; (La.App.
State v. Franklin 803 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Hopkins 799 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Jeselink 799 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Collier 792 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Ouzts 777 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Henderson, 31,986 (La.App.2d Cir.8/18/99) .
State v. Roddy 756 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Coleman 756 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Randle 750 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Henderson 740 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Landry 729 So. 2d 1019 La. 1999
(possibly avoiding new trial after conviction by remanding for a reopened suppression hearing; prosecution at first suppression hearing failed to fully establish either probable cause or break in causal connection between arrest and confession); (same; prosecution at first suppression hearing failed to rebut evidence of coerced confession); (same; holding that prosecution had burden at first suppression hearing of rebutting each of defendant's coercion claims).
State v. Amato 698 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
the State introduced during rebuttal a confession by defendant to a collateral offense.
State v. Gantt 616 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Bobby Ray Williams, supra .
State v. Widenhouse 582 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
1774 , 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964); State v. Thompson, supra ; do not stand for defense counsel's proposition that the state had to present witnesses anew to prove defendant did not suffer a mental abnormality which negated his ability to intelligently and knowingly waive his right to remain silent.
State v. Crook 517 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Creel 508 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Johnson 479 So. 2d 344 La. 1985
art. 703(C); State v. Collum, supra.
State v. Rogers 476 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Explained State v. Joseph 454 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Handley 453 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Foley 456 So. 2d 979 La. 1984
after remand which upheld a life sentence for a sixteen year old aggravated rapist and State v. Rogers, 275 N.C.
State v. Vessell 450 So. 2d 938 La. 1984
State v. Palmer 448 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 445 So. 2d 1171 La. 1984
State v. Sterling 444 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Explained State v. Jackson 424 So. 2d 997 La. 1982
State v. Perry 408 So. 2d 1358 La. 1982
State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981
State v. Kent 391 So. 2d 429 La. 1981
State v. Green 390 So. 2d 1253 La. 1980
The control of evidence presented on rebuttal is within the sound discretion of the trial judge, and there was no abuse of discretion here.
State v. Harris 383 So. 2d 1 La. 1980
State v. Charles 397 So. 2d 469 La. 1980
State v. Foote 379 So. 2d 1058 La. 1980
Explained State v. Edwards 375 So. 2d 1365 La. 1979
State v. Stevenson 374 So. 2d 1189 La. 1979
( 305 So.2d at 912 ) See, also, (1978); (La.
State v. Sheppard 371 So. 2d 1135 La. 1979
State v. Johnson 371 So. 2d 1155 La. 1979
State v. Collum 365 So. 2d 1272 La. 1979
State v. McGraw 366 So. 2d 1278 La. 1979
State ex rel. Joiner 365 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
State v. Johnson 363 So. 2d 684 La. 1978
State v. Jackson 362 So. 2d 1082 La. 1978
State v. Burge 362 So. 2d 1371 La. 1978
State v. Hills, La., (1977); State v. Moore, La., (1976); State v. Smith, La., cert.
State v. Boyd 359 So. 2d 931 La. 1978