DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Carter, 352 So. 2d 607.

58 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Richard Wayne Barras La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Elie, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    art. 404]; State v. Carter, [ ]
  • State v. Elie 74 So. 3d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    art. 404]; State v. Carter, [ ]
  • State of Louisiana v. H. A., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    art. 404]; State v. Carter, []
  • State v. HA, SR. 47 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    art. 404]; State v. Carter, [ ]
  • State v. Nix 987 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    art. 495.1 and an earlier case, which interpreted the earlier incarnation of art. 495.1.
  • State v. JTS 865 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    15:446; State v. Carter, [ ]
  • State of Louisiana v. J.T.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    15: 446; State v. Carter, []; (La.
  • State v. J.T.S. 865 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    15:446; State v. Carter, [ ]
  • State v. Washington 846 So. 2d 723 La. 2003
    -610 (La.1977) 5 , this court explained: Joinder of offenses is the charging of an accused with two or more crimes as multiple counts in a single indictment.
  • State v. Washington 846 So. 2d 723 La. 2003
    -610 (La.1977) [5] , this court explained: Joinder of offenses is the charging of an accused with two or more crimes as multiple counts in a single indictment.
  • State v. Lee 764 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Jackson 746 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    art. 495.1 and relying on an earlier case
  • State v. Smith 557 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Gray 556 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    the Supreme Court held that under LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Schneider 542 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    and other cases which had suggested that, in order for separate offenses to be tried together, evidence of each should have been admissible at the trial of others.
  • State v. Brooks 541 So. 2d 801 La. 1989
  • State v. Baker 535 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    the court stated that Art. 495.1, as it read at that time, normally required severance when the offenses were joined *864 solely because they were of the "same or similar" character unless evidence of each offense would have been respectively admissible at the separate trial of the other.
  • State v. Stevens 522 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Lowe 485 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Labuzan 480 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    See State v. Washington, supra
  • State v. Johnson 464 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    art. 495.1 as follows: we held that art. 495.1, as it read at that time, normally required severance when the offenses were joined solely because they were of the “same or similar” character unless evidence of each offense would have been respectively admissible at the separate trial of the other.
  • State v. Bennett 457 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    held that normally severance is required when the offenses were joined simply because of their “same or similar” nature unless the evidence of such offenses *745 would have been respectively admissible at separate trials.
  • State v. Celestine 452 So. 2d 676 La. 1984
    we held that art. 495.1, as it read at that time, [3] normally required severance when the offenses were joined solely because they were of the "same or similar" character unless evidence of each offense would have been respectively admissible at the separate trial of the other.
  • State v. Joseph 441 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Moore 440 So. 2d 134 La. 1983
  • State v. Craddock 435 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    *1116 Article 495.1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was amended in 1978 to adopt the interest of justice standard of the federal rules rather than the "appropriate to promote"
  • State v. Washington 430 So. 2d 641 La. 1983
  • State v. Washington 430 So. 2d 641 La. 1983
  • State v. Williams 418 So. 2d 562 La. 1982
    we held that art. 495.1, as it read at that time, [3] normally required severance *565 when the offenses were joined solely because they were of the "same or similar" character unless evidence of each offense would have been respectively admissible at the separate trial of the other.
  • State v. Carter 412 So. 2d 540 La. 1982
  • State v. MacHon 410 So. 2d 1065 La. 1982
    that in deciding whether the joinder of similar offenses necessitates a severance because of possible prejudice to the defendant
  • State v. Day 400 So. 2d 622 La. 1981
  • State v. Thomas 395 So. 2d 802 La. 1981
    After reviewing the federal jurisprudence, it was announced that, among the criteria for judging when prejudice might arise from joinder, were those expressed in State v. *804 Carter, (La.
  • State v. Washington 386 So. 2d 1368 La. 1980
  • State v. Washington 386 So. 2d 1368 La. 1980
    art. 495.1 mandates severance in his case.
  • State v. Harris 383 So. 2d 1 La. 1980
    [2] a determination that multiple counts of the same or similar character may be simultaneously tried requires that the counts be mutually admissible as legitimate "other crimes"
  • State v. Lecompte 371 So. 2d 239 La. 1979
    State v. Holstead, supra
  • State v. Durr 371 So. 2d 790 La. 1979
  • State v. Jacobs 371 So. 2d 727 La. 1979
  • State v. Coleman 369 So. 2d 1286 La. 1979
    a determination that multiple counts charging offenses of the same or similar character may be simultaneously tried ordinarily requires that the counts be mutually admissible as legitimate "other crimes"
  • State v. Dickinson 370 So. 2d 557 La. 1979
  • State v. Hamilton 364 So. 2d 585 La. 1978
    In interpreting the statutory command that the trial court shall grant a severance whenever it will promote a fair trial, (La.
  • State v. Boone 364 So. 2d 978 La. 1978
    and a general statement to the effect that the trial judge fell into legal error when he refused to sever the offenses charged, the defense has not pointed out to this Court wherein severance "is deemed appropriate to promote a fair determination of defendant's guilt or innocence on each offense."
  • State v. Carter 362 So. 2d 510 La. 1978
    [2] Since this case is not one which involves the joinder of offenses of the "same or similar character,"
  • State v. Lewis 358 So. 2d 1285 La. 1978
  • State v. Quinn 358 So. 2d 1267 La. 1978
    require a reversal here.
  • State v. Labostrie 358 So. 2d 1243 La. 1978
    [2] Since this is not a case which involves the joinder of offenses of the "same or similar character,"
  • State v. Cramer 358 So. 2d 1277 La. 1978
  • State v. Showers 359 So. 2d 104 La. 1978
    (rehearing denied, December 14, 1977), after full discussion, we held that "when offenses, which have been joined solely because they are the same or similar character offenses, are not legitimate `other crimes' under Prieur and its progeny, they should normally be severed upon pre-trial motion of the accused or