DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pearce v. Pearce, 348 So. 2d 75.

179 citing documents.

  • Slaughter v. Slaughter 436 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Rumore v. Smith 430 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Souza v. Souza 428 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • Taddonio v. Kinney-Taddonio 428 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • Holmgren v. Kaigle 425 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Rodrigue v. Rodrigue 424 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the applicable principles for an award of alimony under LSA-C.C.
  • Schexnayder v. Schexnayder 424 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
  • Honley v. Honley 416 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • Harrington v. Campbell 413 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Douglas v. Douglas, supra; (La.App.
  • Boudreaux v. Boudreaux 407 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "...
  • Brister v. Brister 402 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Lauro v. Lauro 399 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    the court set forth the applicable principles as follows: "We have held that, under this statute representing an award of alimony to a wife without `fault' the word `fault' contemplates conduct or substantial acts of commission or omission by the wife violative of her marital duties and responsibilities.
  • McKnight v. McKnight 401 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Guerra v. Guerra 401 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Kriger v. Kriger 397 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    In reviewing the trial judge’s finding in connection with this appeal, : “In the area of domestic relations, much discretion must be vested in the trial judge and particularly in evaluating the weight of evidence which is to be resolved primarily on the basis of the credibility of witnesses.
  • Galbraith v. Galbraith 396 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Moore v. Moore 393 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    as follows: "We have held that, under this statute respecting an award of alimony to a wife without `fault', the word `fault' contemplates conduct or substantial acts of commission or omission by the wife violative of her marital duties and responsibilities.
  • Vail v. Vail 390 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
  • Adams v. Adams 389 So. 2d 381 La. 1980
    In interpreting this requirement, : "We have held that, under this statute respecting an award of alimony to a wife without `fault', the word `fault' contemplates conduct or substantial acts of commission or omission by the wife violative of her marital duties and responsibilities.
  • Kean v. Kean 388 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    (1977): "In the area of domestic relations, much discretion must be vested in the trial judge and particularly in evaluating the weight of evidence which is to be resolved primarily on the basis of the credibility of witnesses.
  • Hebert v. Hebert 381 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    at p. 78: “In the area of domestic relations, much discretion must be vested in the trial judge and particularly in evaluating the weight of evidence which is to be resolved primarily on the basis of the credibility of witnesses.
  • Aguillard v. Aguillard 380 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Rittiner v. Sinclair 374 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    160 in Pearce v. Pearce, La.1977, , and Fulmer v. Fulmer, La.1974, , and from C.C.
  • Brocato v. Brocato 369 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Courville v. Courville 363 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    The Louisiana Supreme Court granted writs at and did not consider this discussion by the court of appeals, holding instead that the trial court's ruling on the wife's freedom from fault was not manifestly erroneous and disposed of the case on this ground.
  • LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 362 So. 2d 568 La. 1978
    Recently, in Pearce v. Pearce, La., (1977), this Court set forth the applicable principles as follows: "We have held that, under this statute respecting an award of alimony to a wife without `fault,' the word `fault' contemplates conduct or substantial acts of commission or omission by the wife violative of her marital duties and responsibilities.
  • Brannon v. Brannon 362 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
  • Bruner v. Bruner 356 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
    The factual findings of the trial court are therefore to be accorded very substantial weight on review, (cite omitted) The trial court based its finding that adultery was proven on the following undisputed circumstances: About the time Frank Bruner separated from his wife in the early fall of 1975, he began a relationship with a local widow.
  • Saucier v. Saucier 357 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978