Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Muller, 351 So. 2d 143.

42 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Tatianna Jenell Burns La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Victor Wayne Loyd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Loyd 274 So. 3d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
art. 780 ; State v. Kahey , , 486 (La.1983) ; State v. Muller , , 146-47 (La.1977).
State v. White 269 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Morris 178 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hicks, supra; State v. Davis, 41,180 (La.App.2d Cir.11/3/06), .
State v. Morgan 134 So. 3d 1160 La. 2014
lationship of trust that must necessarily exist between the bench and bar.”); (declining to adopt a rule requiring trial judges to inform defendants personally of the right to trial by jury); -09 (La.1978) (declining to adopt a rule barring waiver of jury trial except by defendant personally); -47 (La.1977) (declining to adopt a rule that judges must advise defendants personally of the right to trial by jury).
State v. Carter 121 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 3/29/05) , , writ denied, 05-1450 (La.1/13/06), (citations omitted), State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (per curiam); -47 (La.1977); State v. Howard, 10-869 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Ben James Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
art. 780; -47 (La.1977).
State v. Thompson 100 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 780; -47 (La.1977).
State v. Martin 70 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Dominguez 52 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Const, art. I, §§ 16, 17
State v. Scott 42 So. 3d 444 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Const, art. I, §§ 16, 17
State v. Hicks 945 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Davis 942 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Also see State v. Kahey, supra ; State v. Arnold, 30,282 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Rideau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Rideau 943 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968)
State v. Zeringue 862 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
art. 780; -47 (La.1977).
State v. Simton 847 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Pierre 842 So. 2d 321 La. 2003
art. 780; -47 (La.1977).
State v. James 751 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Arnold 706 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Mandigo 702 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Const. art. I, §§ 16, 17
State v. Richardson 575 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Burton 540 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Eppinette, supra ; (La.App.
State v. Moya 539 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Cappel 525 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Gillespie 486 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Eppinette 478 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Bissett 451 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Smith 447 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct.
State v. Boult 440 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Trosclair 443 So. 2d 1098 La. 1983
State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968)
State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. McKinney 406 So. 2d 160 La. 1981
3098 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1138 (1977); knowing and informed and by an accused who understands the consequences of his act, appeal after remand
State v. Williams 404 So. 2d 954 La. 1981
State v. Galliano 396 So. 2d 1288 La. 1981
State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
783 , 13 L.Ed.2d 630 (1965)
State v. Johnson 389 So. 2d 1302 La. 1980
State v. Manning 380 So. 2d 54 La. 1980
State v. Phillips 365 So. 2d 1304 La. 1978
State v. Muller 365 So. 2d 464 La. 1978