Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dardar, 353 So. 2d 713.

17 citing documents.

  • State v. DHILLY 996 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Chet K. Whatley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Walker, 204 La.
  • State v. Whatley 858 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Walker, 204 La.
  • Distinguished State v. Guillory 773 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    [5] a distinguishable case in which the controversy on appeal was the judge's specific intent charge, not a charge on the defense of intoxication.
  • State v. Page 680 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Nelson 487 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Harper 480 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Connors 432 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    14:11 states that "in the absence of qualifying provisions, the terms `intent' and `intentional' have reference to `general criminal intent.'" -16 (La.1977) reviewed this concept.
  • State v. West 419 So. 2d 868 La. 1982
  • State v. Perry 408 So. 2d 1358 La. 1982
    State v. Walker, 204 La.
  • State v. Motton 395 So. 2d 1337 La. 1981
  • State v. Sinegal 393 So. 2d 684 La. 1981
  • State v. Abercrumbia 382 So. 2d 927 La. 1980
    He left “a homicide committed, without any intent to cause death or great bodily harm” standing alone as a definition of manslaughter without the intended qualifying phrase “when the offender is engaged in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of any felony not enumerated in Articles 30 or 30.1, or any intentional misdemeanor directly affecting the person.” (La.
  • State v. Webb 372 So. 2d 1209 La. 1979
  • State v. Dupre 369 So. 2d 1303 La. 1979
  • State v. Johnson 368 So. 2d 719 La. 1979
    (specific intent is an element of the offense of simple burglary); accord: (La.