DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carollo v. Wilson, 353 So. 2d 249.

108 citing documents.

  • Swann v. City-Parish 492 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    : The courts of appeal have a constitutional duty to review the law and facts and thereafter render a judgment on quantum based on the merits, determining whether the jury has abused its "much discretion" that the law accords it in awarding damages....
  • Dobson v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 484 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Ard v. Samedan Oil Corp. 483 So. 2d 925 La. 1986
    art. 5, § 10(B); La.Civ.Code art. 1999; [3] Temple v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
  • Richardson v. Continental Ins. Co. 468 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Capone v. King 467 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • Guillory v. Agee 465 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Tate v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, (La.
  • Lang v. Prince 447 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Benson v. Seagraves 445 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    "It is only after [an] articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, (La.
  • Cummings v. Nixon 442 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    “It is only after [an] articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, Carollo v. Wil *1293 son, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Hart v. Allstate Ins. Co. 437 So. 2d 823 La. 1983
    La.Civ.Code art. 1934(3); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Cullivan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 428 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Dunaway v. Rester Refrigeration Service, Inc. 428 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, Schexnayder v. Carpenter, 346 * or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Walker v. Marcev 427 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • Ducoing v. Carter 427 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Ferguson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., (La.App.
  • Gibson v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 426 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, (La.
  • Liner v. City of Houma 423 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Turner v. Kentie 422 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • LeBlanc v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 420 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Richard v. Trahan 417 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Merrell v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. 415 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Palermo v. Allstate Ins. Co. 415 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Wright v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 415 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Tucker v. Howes 413 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Hardy v. State, Through Dept. of Highways 412 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    4th Cir. 1975); a Louisiana Supreme Court case in which $1,000,000.00 in damages was reduced to $600,000.00, but which probably represented both general damages and loss of wages; (La.
  • Smith v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 412 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    The Department suggests that an award of $500,000
  • Black v. Ebasco Services, Inc. 411 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Smith v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. 412 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    The Department suggests that an award of $500,000
  • Blanchard v. A-1 Bit and Tool Co., Inc. 406 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Howell v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 408 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Wattigny v. Lambert 408 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Levesque v. Saba 402 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Curtis v. Curtis 403 So. 2d 56 La. 1981
    Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Autin v. Allstate Ins. Co. 402 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds.
  • Locicero v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 399 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Provost v. A. E. Gravois & Sons, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Hill v. Murco, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Mullin v. Vessier 400 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Cappo v. Vinson Guard Service, Inc. 400 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    In that decision the court outlined the test for appellate courts to use in reviewing awards as follows: "It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Knuckles v. Beaugh 392 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Olds v. Ashley, [ 250 La.
  • Richard v. Guillory 392 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Schexnayder v. Carpenter, supra; Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Chaney v. Our Lady of Fatima Cath. Church 391 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Litton v. Home Indemnity Co. 391 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Prats v. Moffett 391 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facte discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for *1303 articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Sinitiere v. Lavergne 391 So. 2d 821 La. 1980
  • Benedic v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 389 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reasons, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Choate v. Greene 386 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., Inc. 386 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Hebert v. Diamond M Co. 385 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
  • Johnson v. Franks 383 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.