Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Frentz, 354 So. 2d 1007.

30 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Derrick Walker Stafford -Aka- Derrick Stafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Stafford 241 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
15:480 ; State v. Frentz , ; see also State v. Harvey , ; ; State v. Ivy , ; State v. Banks
State v. Kennedy 803 So. 2d 916 La. 2001
Our opinion today is in some respects inconsistent with the language, but not the holdings
State v. Fuller 759 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Taylor 621 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Bairnsfather 576 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Lambert 550 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Eishtadt 531 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Troquille 493 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
the Louisiana Supreme Court summarized the admissibility of “character” testimony as follows: Testimony as to “character” (reputation) may be admissible for two distinct purposes, with differing rules and reasons: (1) The credibility of a witness may be attacked “by showing that his general reputation for t
State v. Bahm 490 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Fanning 485 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
” the Supreme Court stated: “...
State v. Picchini 463 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Vessell 450 So. 2d 938 La. 1984
15:481; See also, and cases cited therein.
State v. Rault 445 So. 2d 1203 La. 1984
State v. Rodrigue 441 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
15:490, 491, or the witness' credibility may be attacked only insofar as his credibility in the case on trial is concerned, La.R.S.
State v. Paul 439 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Deaton 412 So. 2d 586 La. 1982
State v. Bryan 398 So. 2d 1019 La. 1981
the Court noted that R.S.
State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
State v. George, supra .
State v. Cann 392 So. 2d 381 La. 1981
State v. Stevenson 390 So. 2d 1292 La. 1980
15:490, 491, or the witness' credibility may be attacked only insofar as his credibility in the case on trial is concerned, La.R.S.
State v. Davis 389 So. 2d 71 La. 1980
State v. Hatcher 372 So. 2d 1024 La. 1979
Our opinion today is in some respects inconsistent with the language, but not the holdings
State v. Bagley 378 So. 2d 1356 La. 1979
State v. Short 368 So. 2d 1078 La. 1979
State v. Gomez 365 So. 2d 1313 La. 1978
State v. Herman 358 So. 2d 1282 La. 1978
State v. Cramer 358 So. 2d 1277 La. 1978
See State v. Frentz, La., (1978).
State v. Landry 359 So. 2d 99 La. 1978
15:490, 491; ) it was properly excluded by the trial court as improper character evidence as used in the present case.