DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crochet, 354 So. 2d 1288.

19 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Eric Dewayne Lafleur A/K/A Eric Vezia A/K/A Derrick Lafleur A/K/A Derrick Vezia La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald L. Bryant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The court noted that what the defendant had proposed was not a the display of teeth, the display of a tattoo.
  • State v. Spradley 722 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that while there is no requirement that the doctors appointed to a sanity commission be psychiatrists, the refusal to appoint an available psychiatrist to a sanity commission could constitute an abuse of discretion.
  • State v. Ingram 688 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Dailey 607 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that while there is no requirement that the doctors appointed to a sanity commission be psychiatrists, the refusal to appoint an available psychiatrist to a sanity commission could constitute an abuse of discretion.
  • State v. Pierre 606 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Helaire 496 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Troquille 493 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    What defendant proposed was not a [display of teeth], [display of tatoo].
  • State v. Robertson 454 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Rault 445 So. 2d 1203 La. 1984
    What defendant proposed was not a [display of teeth], [display of tatoo].
  • State v. Square 433 So. 2d 104 La. 1983
    display of tattoo; display of scar; defendant required to show his teeth.
  • State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
    State v. Lawrence, supra ; ).
  • State v. Holmes 393 So. 2d 670 La. 1981
    State v. Lawrence, supra; State v. Bennett, supra.
  • State v. Sonnier 379 So. 2d 1336 La. 1980
    State v. Monroe, supra ; State v. McIntyre, supra
  • State v. Jones 376 So. 2d 125 La. 1979
  • State v. Daniel 378 So. 2d 1361 La. 1979
  • State v. Dickinson 370 So. 2d 557 La. 1979
    where defense counsel attempted to have prospective jurors express their concept of reasonable doubt in terms of a percentage of proof, an answer to the inquiry had the potential of confusing or misleading those who ultimately would be responsible for trying the case, especially where (as here) the trial ju
  • State v. Hayes 364 So. 2d 923 La. 1978
  • State v. Boen 362 So. 2d 519 La. 1978