Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Guillot, 353 So. 2d 1005.

91 citing documents.

State v. Harriman 469 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Signal 467 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972)
State v. Jones 457 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Manson v. Brathwaite, supra.
State v. McLeland 456 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Tate 454 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Lucky 453 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); writ denied
State v. Dryer 449 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Boutte 447 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Stewart, supra.
State v. White 446 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Marx 446 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Nathan 444 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. King 444 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Roberson 445 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Smith, supra ; (La.
State v. Johnson 443 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Clark 437 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 31 La. 1983
State v. Chaney 423 So. 2d 1092 La. 1982
State v. Stucke 419 So. 2d 939 La. 1982
State v. Yarbrough 418 So. 2d 503 La. 1982
State v. Chapman 410 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
2243, 2253 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); State v. Guillot, supra [ ].
State v. Davis 407 So. 2d 702 La. 1981
State v. Williams 402 So. 2d 678 La. 1981
State v. Guiden 399 So. 2d 194 La. 1981
this court announced that it would employ the following five factors set forth in Manson to balance the corrupting effect of a suggestive identification: the witness' opportunity to view the crime; the degree of attention paid by the witness; the accuracy of any prior description; the level of certainty dis
State v. Nicholas 397 So. 2d 1308 La. 1981
State v. Friddle 396 So. 2d 1242 La. 1981
State v. Palrean 395 So. 2d 687 La. 1981
State v. Stewart 389 So. 2d 1321 La. 1980
State v. Skipper 387 So. 2d 592 La. 1980
art. 615, our review, because venue is a factual question, is limited on appeal to whether the state submitted some evidence of proper venue.
State v. Robinson 386 So. 2d 1374 La. 1980
State v. Davis 385 So. 2d 193 La. 1980
State v. Franklin 381 So. 2d 826 La. 1980
Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. Doucet 380 So. 2d 605 La. 1979
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Vaughn 378 So. 2d 905 La. 1979
The line-up similarly consisted of five individuals of "a sufficient resemblance to reasonably test the identification" ( ).
State v. Williams 375 So. 2d 364 La. 1979
this court indicated that it would employ the five factors articulated in Manson v. Brathwaite, supra, to balance the corrupting effect of a suggestive identification.
State Ex Rel. Fields v. Maggio 368 So. 2d 1016 La. 1979
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Huckaby 368 So. 2d 1059 La. 1979
State v. Guillot 367 So. 2d 864 La. 1979
State v. Gipson 359 So. 2d 87 La. 1978
State v. Smith 357 So. 2d 798 La. 1978
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Western 355 So. 2d 1314 La. 1978
In any event, the statement made in the ruling was not prejudicial, See State v. Guillot, La., (1977).
State v. Sutfield 354 So. 2d 1334 La. 1978