Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dupar, 353 So. 2d 272.

21 citing documents.

  • State v. Grant 105 So. 3d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    (“An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review.”); (same).
  • State v. Marlowe 81 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 4 (La.9/17/99), (“An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review”), State ex rel.
  • State ex rel. D.R. 50 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    rder of the court is made or sought, makes known to the court the action which he desires the court to take, or of his objections to the action of the court, and the grounds therefor, (emphasis added) “It is well settled that [a] defendant must state the basis for his objection when he makes it so that the trial judge has an opportunity to rule on it and prevent or cure an error.”
  • State v. Jones 862 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See also State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 4 (La.9/17/99), (“An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review”)
  • State v. Briscoe 779 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    App. 4 Cir. 7/21/99), , writ denied, 1999-2519 (La.2/25/00), ; see also State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 4 (La.9/17/99), ("An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review"), (La.
  • State v. Richards 750 So. 2d 940 La. 1999
    ("An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review."); (same).
  • State v. Washington 550 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Caillouet 496 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73 La. 1983
    2214 , 65 L.Ed.2d 159 (1980); State v. Sykes, supra
  • State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Talbot 408 So. 2d 861 La. 1981
  • State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981
  • State v. Provo 396 So. 2d 1298 La. 1981
  • Criticized State v. Oliver 387 So. 2d 1154 La. 1980
    662; , (La., 1976); and 38 La.L.Rev.
  • State v. Brown 371 So. 2d 746 La. 1979
  • State v. Johnson 368 So. 2d 719 La. 1979
  • State v. Sykes 364 So. 2d 1293 La. 1978
  • State v. Thompson 364 So. 2d 908 La. 1978
  • State v. Carter 363 So. 2d 893 La. 1978
    State v. Dupar, La., (1977); State v. Elzie, La., (1977); and State v. Victor, La., (1977).
  • State v. Boen 362 So. 2d 519 La. 1978
    and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Pounds 359 So. 2d 150 La. 1978
    The majority opinions of this Court which permit a prosecutor to cross-examine a defendant on the circumstances surrounding the crime forming the basis of a prior conviction, regardless of their irrelevance *154 to the witness' credibility, have been criticized, Pugh, The Work of the Louisiana Appellate Courts for the 1974-1975 Term-Evidence, 36 La.L.Rev.