DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baumgartner v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 356 So. 2d 400.

121 citing documents.

  • Smith v. New Orleans Public Serv., Inc. 391 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
  • Marks v. Singleton 391 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    The trial court, in its instructions to the jury, correctly explained the duty imposed upon a motorist with regard to pedestrians
  • Jordan v. Lloyd 387 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Fontenot v. American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. 386 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Co., marked the demise of the plea of contributory negligence as a defense to a claim arising out of a pedestrian-automobile collision.
  • Hryhorchuk v. Smith 379 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Co., makes clear that contributory negligence is no longer a defense to a pedestrian's claim for damages sustained due to the negligence of a motorist.
  • Ainsworth v. Bituminous Cas. Corp. 379 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Widcamp v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 381 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    The law concerning the contributory negligence of a
  • Young v. Wayde 383 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Dofflemyer v. Gilley 378 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    In support of this, argument
  • Osby v. Harris 375 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
  • Payton v. Travelers Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
  • Mathews v. Allstate Auto. Ins. Co. 370 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
  • Dunn v. Bolden 372 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    Co., as authority for her contention that contributory negligence cannot bar a pedestrian from recovery of damages sustained due to the negligence of a motorist.
  • Junot v. Lee 372 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    Co., La., (holding a pedestrian-plaintiff's contributory negligence will not bar his recovery in a pedestrian-automobile accident); Turner v. Bucher, La., (holding a parent with whom a child resides is liable for the damages occasioned by the child's acts, which acts are tortious when measured by normal standards
  • Rody v. Ross 371 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Jones v. Rousseau 370 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Dufrene v. Dixie Auto Insurance 364 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    which deals with a pedestrian-automobile situation.
  • Fitch v. Evans 364 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
    Co., as authority for her contention that contributory negligence cannot bar a pedestrian from recovery when he is injured due to the negligence of the motorist.
  • Beck v. Allstate Ins. Co. 359 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    We are not here confronted with a where the question was the contributory negligence of the pedestrian.
  • Sentry Ins. Co. v. Thomas 360 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    in discussing the relative duty of automobile drivers and pedestrians, the Supreme Court stated at page 405: "That is, the operator of a dangerous instrumentality, such as a motor vehicle, creates a great risk of injury to the life and limb of others.
  • Bonfiglio v. McDempsey 360 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Plaintiff contends, that contributory negligence is no longer a bar to recovery in an automobile-pedestrian accident suit and that the judgment of the trial court must be reversed.