Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Henderson v. Travelers Ins. Co., 354 So. 2d 1031.

18 citing documents.

Latashia v. Perez, Both Individually and on Behalf of Unborn Child of Travis Chiokai (Deceased) v. Irby Construction … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
“The status as concubine arises when a man and a woman live together in a permanent relationship as husband and wife, although without benefit of matrimony or a putative marriage.” Because Ms. Perez is stipulated to have been Mr. Chiokai’s concubine, it is admitted that she was living with Mr. Chiokai
State v. Davis 176 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., Succession of Moore, 232 La.
Russell v. House of Raeford Farms 968 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Estate of Arceneaux v. Frank's Casing Crew & Rental Tools, Inc. 721 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Crigler v. Crigler 671 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Petty v. Petty 560 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Co., Succession of Moore, 232 La.
Gaffney v. Saenger Theatre Partnership, Ltd. 539 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
355 , overruled on other grounds; (La.App.
Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. Teague 521 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Winn v. Thompson-Hayward Chemical Co. 522 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Gray v. Gray 451 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Thomas v. Thomas 440 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Cook v. Cook 436 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court stated: "The status as concubine arises when a man and a woman live together in a permanent relationship as husband and wife, although without benefit of matrimony or a putative marriage.
CNA Insurance v. Fincher 428 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
In this case we decide whether Betty Jean Hindman (Fincher), as the former concubine of the deceased, Ricky Joe Fincher, is entitled to workers’
Martin v. Rollins Services Inc. 424 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Castle v. Prudhomme Tank Truck Line, Inc. 417 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
I held that a concubine was entitled to benefits as a dependent member of a deceased insured worker's family, and that in Patin v. T. L. James and Company, Inc., 218 La.
Jackson v. Continental Cas. Co. 412 So. 2d 1364 La. 1982
Jackson v. Continental Cas. Co. 402 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Rivers v. MacCo 391 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Co., (footnote 1) (La.1978); (La.App.