Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tucker, 354 So. 2d 521.
- State v. Hunter 94 So. 3d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- State v. Parker 594 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- State v. Coleman 574 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
-
State v. Higginbotham
541 So. 2d 348
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
The court may consider information from a wide range of sources including prior court proceedings, the pre-sentence report, juvenile records, conversations with the victim, and submissions by the defense counsel.
-
State v. Lapworth
517 So. 2d 485
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
See State v. Watson ; (La.App.
-
State v. Jack
448 So. 2d 725
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
noted such an open court disclosure of a juvenile record "may have been improper ..."
- State v. Guajardo 428 So. 2d 468 La. 1983
- State v. Moore 419 So. 2d 963 La. 1982
- State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981
-
State v. Alford
384 So. 2d 761
La. 1980
this Court held: "This Court's appellate jurisdiction is limited to questions of law, and it will not reverse a conviction on a question of guilt or innocence unless there is no evidence of an essential element of a crimea situation which presents a question of law, it being illegal to convict a person of
-
State v. Williams
383 So. 2d 369
La. 1980
State v. Main Motors, Inc.
-
State v. Valentine
364 So. 2d 595
La. 1978
Our standard of review was recently reiterated in State v. Tucker, La., (1978): *598 "This Court's appellate jurisdiction is limited to questions of law, and it will not reverse a conviction on a question of guilt or innocence unless there is no evidence of an essential element of a crime a situation which presents a question of law, it being illegal to convict a person of crime on no e
- State v. Jackson 362 So. 2d 766 La. 1978