Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tucker, 354 So. 2d 521.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Hunter 94 So. 3d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Parker 594 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Coleman 574 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Higginbotham 541 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    The court may consider information from a wide range of sources including prior court proceedings, the pre-sentence report, juvenile records, conversations with the victim, and submissions by the defense counsel.
  • State v. Lapworth 517 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    See State v. Watson ; (La.App.
  • State v. Jack 448 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    noted such an open court disclosure of a juvenile record "may have been improper ..."
  • State v. Guajardo 428 So. 2d 468 La. 1983
  • State v. Moore 419 So. 2d 963 La. 1982
  • State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981
  • State v. Alford 384 So. 2d 761 La. 1980
    this Court held: "This Court's appellate jurisdiction is limited to questions of law, and it will not reverse a conviction on a question of guilt or innocence unless there is no evidence of an essential element of a crime—a situation which presents a question of law, it being illegal to convict a person of
  • State v. Williams 383 So. 2d 369 La. 1980
    State v. Main Motors, Inc.
  • State v. Valentine 364 So. 2d 595 La. 1978
    Our standard of review was recently reiterated in State v. Tucker, La., (1978): *598 "This Court's appellate jurisdiction is limited to questions of law, and it will not reverse a conviction on a question of guilt or innocence unless there is no evidence of an essential element of a crime — a situation which presents a question of law, it being illegal to convict a person of crime on no e
  • State v. Jackson 362 So. 2d 766 La. 1978