Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Segers, 357 So. 2d 1.

29 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Eric Joseph Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
rehearing granted on other grounds
State v. Smith 58 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
rehearing granted on other grounds
State v. JPF 32 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. J.P. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Larry Surratt and Cynthia Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
rehearing granted on other grounds
State v. Surratt 932 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
rehearing granted on other grounds
State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
1978), rehearing granted on other grounds, (La.
State v. Womack 592 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
rehearing granted, (sentenced affirmed).
State v. Armstrong 557 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Davis 528 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
2d 1013 (La.1977); State v. Cox, 369 So.
State v. Cushman 481 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Devillier 466 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
589 , 30 L.Ed.2d 592 (1972); United States v. Espinoza, 481 F.2d 553 (C.A.5th 1973); (La.
State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King 436 So. 2d 559 La. 1983
State v. Boyette 434 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Lockwood 399 So. 2d 190 La. 1981
State v. Phillips 391 So. 2d 1155 La. 1980
State v. Telsee 388 So. 2d 747 La. 1980
State v. Richardson 377 So. 2d 1029 La. 1979
State v. Owens 377 So. 2d 316 La. 1979
State v. Delatte 372 So. 2d 1200 La. 1979
Distinguished State v. Jacobs 371 So. 2d 727 La. 1979
relied upon by the defense.
State v. Cox 369 So. 2d 118 La. 1979
State v. Songy 367 So. 2d 1178 La. 1979
State v. Trahan 367 So. 2d 752 La. 1979
State v. Sepulvado 367 So. 2d 762 La. 1979
We commend him for so doing, since this helpful practice avoids remands to determine the basis of the sentence, see, e. g., is fundamentally fair in affording the accused an opportunity to rebut or explain unfavorable facts, and may well be the most appropriate and expeditious mechanism to explain the context in which the wide sentencing discretion of the trial court is to be exerc
State v. Kaercher 362 So. 2d 754 La. 1978
741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); on rehearing
State v. Theriot 361 So. 2d 1206 La. 1978
State v. Bosworth, No. 61,492
State v. Bosworth 360 So. 2d 173 La. 1978
State v. Segers 355 So. 2d 238 La. 1978
For Rehearing Opinion in No. 60388, .