Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lindinger, 357 So. 2d 500.
- State of Louisiana Versus Roger Barber La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
-
State v. Bennett
87 So. 3d 184
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
the Louisiana Supreme Court found that there was not sufficient circumstantial evidence to support a conviction of driving while intoxicated.
-
State v. Thurman
18 So. 3d 800
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
In support of his argument
-
State of Louisiana v. Jake M. Thurman
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
In support of his argument
- State v. Lambert 720 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
-
State v. Smith
638 So. 2d 1212
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
the Louisiana Supreme Court emphasized that, under Louisiana Revised Statute 14:98, the State must prove the accused operated a vehicle while intoxicated.
- State v. Blake 575 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- State v. Boutte 564 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Christy 551 So. 2d 616 La. 1989
-
State v. Morgan
553 So. 2d 1012
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
The Supreme Court found the evidence sufficient to support the conviction of both defendants, applying the following test: (La.
-
State v. Wren
549 So. 2d 889
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Defendant relies on this lack of evidence (who was driving when) to premise his argument that the evidence otherwise is legally insufficient
- State v. Sheldon 541 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Blancaneaux
535 So. 2d 1338
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the Supreme Court stressed that under LSA-R.S.
- State v. Willson 534 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
-
State v. Trahan
534 So. 2d 73
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
(quoting Thomas v. State, 277 Md.
-
Distinguished
State v. Babineaux
508 So. 2d 606
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
2d Cir.1984), resting against ( or asleep in ( (La.App.2d Cir.1984; (La.App.
- State v. Skeetoe 501 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Edens 465 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
-
State v. Phinney
460 So. 2d 1188
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
v. Lindinger, and State of La.
- City of Bastrop v. Paxton 457 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Rutan
448 So. 2d 267
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court stressed that under R.S.
- State v. Sims 426 So. 2d 148 La. 1983
-
State v. Phillips
389 So. 2d 1260
La. 1980
compelled the granting of his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal in the trial court.
- State v. Entertainment Specialists, Inc. 386 So. 2d 653 La. 1980
-
State v. Mathews
375 So. 2d 1165
La. 1979
See: and decisions therein cited.
-
State v. Victor
368 So. 2d 711
La. 1979
: "For purposes of appellate review, the issue of whether there is a total lack of circumstantial evidence to prove the crime (or an essential element of it) is decided by whether or not there is some evidence from which the trier of fact could reasonably conclude that beyond a reasonable doubt the accus
-
State v. Wrestle, Inc.
360 So. 2d 831
La. 1978
: Sufficiency of the evidence is a factual matter not reviewable on appeal.