Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lindinger, 357 So. 2d 500.

27 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Roger Barber La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
  • State v. Bennett 87 So. 3d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    the Louisiana Supreme Court found that there was not sufficient circumstantial evidence to support a conviction of driving while intoxicated.
  • State v. Thurman 18 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In support of his argument
  • State of Louisiana v. Jake M. Thurman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In support of his argument
  • State v. Lambert 720 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Smith 638 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    the Louisiana Supreme Court emphasized that, under Louisiana Revised Statute 14:98, the State must prove the accused operated a vehicle while intoxicated.
  • State v. Blake 575 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Boutte 564 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Christy 551 So. 2d 616 La. 1989
  • State v. Morgan 553 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    The Supreme Court found the evidence sufficient to support the conviction of both defendants, applying the following test: (La.
  • State v. Wren 549 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    Defendant relies on this lack of evidence (who was driving when) to premise his argument that the evidence otherwise is legally insufficient
  • State v. Sheldon 541 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Blancaneaux 535 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    the Supreme Court stressed that under LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Willson 534 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Trahan 534 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    (quoting Thomas v. State, 277 Md.
  • Distinguished State v. Babineaux 508 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2d Cir.1984), resting against ( or asleep in ( (La.App.2d Cir.1984; (La.App.
  • State v. Skeetoe 501 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Edens 465 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Phinney 460 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    v. Lindinger, and State of La.
  • City of Bastrop v. Paxton 457 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Rutan 448 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    the Supreme Court stressed that under R.S.
  • State v. Sims 426 So. 2d 148 La. 1983
  • State v. Phillips 389 So. 2d 1260 La. 1980
    compelled the granting of his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal in the trial court.
  • State v. Entertainment Specialists, Inc. 386 So. 2d 653 La. 1980
  • State v. Mathews 375 So. 2d 1165 La. 1979
    See: and decisions therein cited.
  • State v. Victor 368 So. 2d 711 La. 1979
    : "For purposes of appellate review, the issue of whether there is a total lack of circumstantial evidence to prove the crime (or an essential element of it) is decided by whether or not there is some evidence from which the trier of fact could reasonably conclude that beyond a reasonable doubt the accus
  • State v. Wrestle, Inc. 360 So. 2d 831 La. 1978
    : Sufficiency of the evidence is a factual matter not reviewable on appeal.