Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dunbar, 356 So. 2d 956.

70 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Orlando Demond Morris Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Fairman 173 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Bradstreet 170 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Briley 151 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
These procedures, however, are not favored by law, but are permissible when close in proximity to the crime’s occurrence.
State ex rel. J.H. 83 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Vargas 66 So. 3d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Bradley , 44,963 at 10, 33 So.3d at 937 ; (whether the defendant consented a fact to be determined by all of the facts and circumstances of the case; the trial judge’s conclusions on credibility are entitled to great weight)(citing Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, supra; cert.
State v. Brown 36 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Smith 960 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Harold 861 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Vicks 798 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Bostic 637 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Van Buren 615 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Shrader 593 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Dickerson 579 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Conway 556 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Williams 536 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Holmes 516 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Green 505 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Johnson, 249 La.
State v. Bueno 499 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Cathey 493 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); State v. Ossey, supra; State v. David, supra
State v. Carter 485 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Augustine 482 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Picot 482 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Watson 477 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Austin 470 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. McCarter 469 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Signal 467 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Murphy 463 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Hodge 457 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Garlepied 454 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Bearden 449 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Dunbar, supra [ ]; "
State v. Senior 446 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Phillips 444 So. 2d 1196 La. 1984
State v. Summers 440 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Foster 437 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
[3] State v. Fisher, supra
State v. Patterson 432 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Glass 431 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
153 (1948); conviction affirmed
State v. Marchese 430 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Simone 428 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State ex rel. Maness v. Black 434 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
restated the test for the existence of consent as “[qjuestions of consent are issues of fact, dealing as they do with credibility, [citations omitted] The determination of the trial judge, who has the opportunity to hear and observe the witnesses, is entitled to great weight on review.” At the motion h
State v. Ijaz 427 So. 2d 848 La. 1983
. held that an appellate court may examine the full record of the trial, and not just the evidence offered at the motion hearing, in determining whether the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress.
State v. Williams 420 So. 2d 1116 La. 1982
State v. Yarbrough 418 So. 2d 503 La. 1982
State v. Tuckson 414 So. 2d 360 La. 1982
Robinson, supra at 1376 .
State v. Chapman 410 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
State v. Bickham 404 So. 2d 929 La. 1981
State v. Robinson 404 So. 2d 907 La. 1981