Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mitchell, 356 So. 2d 974.

26 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Terance Roshell Dawson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    1979) ( trial court' s denial of a motion to sever upheld in case involving kidnapping -attempted rape of one victim and then, a year later, kidnapping -attempted rape of another victim); - 80 ( La.), cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Terry L. Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    (upholding the denial of a motion to sever in a case that involved the kidnapping-attempted rape of one victim and then, a year later, the kidnapping- attempted rape of another victim); cert.
  • State v. Cooley 87 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    (upholding the denial of a motion to sever in a case that involved the kidnapping-attempted rape of one victim and then, a year later, the kidnapping-attempted rape of another victim); cert.
  • State v. Friday 73 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    -60 (La.1979) (where the trial court’s denial of a motion to sever was upheld in a case that involved the kidnapping-attempted rape of one victim and then, a year later, the kidnapping-attempted rape of another victim); , 978- *930 80(La.), cert.
  • State v. MERANTA 30 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    1979) (where the trial court's denial of a motion to sever was upheld in a case that involved the kidnapping-attempted rape of one victim and then, a year later, the kidnapping-attempted rape of another victim); -980 (La.), cert.
  • State v. Carr 618 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Gibson 511 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    We affirmed the trial court's ruling allowing admission of the "other crimes" governed the issue.
  • Paul v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 430 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Long 408 So. 2d 1221 La. 1982
  • State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981
  • State v. Kennedy 398 So. 2d 1082 La. 1981
  • State v. Davis 389 So. 2d 71 La. 1980
    This requirement is satisfied if the "modus operandi of the [other] offenses is so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that they are the work of the same person, i. e., they are `signature crimes.'" (La.
  • State v. Alford 384 So. 2d 761 La. 1980
    La.C.Cr.P., Art. 841; (La.
  • State v. Molinario 383 So. 2d 345 La. 1980
    820 , 59 L.Ed.2d 25 (1979); cert.
  • State v. Prejean 379 So. 2d 240 La. 1980
  • State v. Hatcher 372 So. 2d 1024 La. 1979
  • State v. Lecompte 371 So. 2d 239 La. 1979
    In State v. Mitchell, La., (1978), we set forth the guidelines for severance, as follows: "Two critical questions must be determined by the trial judge presented with a *241 motion for severance of offenses.
  • State v. Coleman 369 So. 2d 1286 La. 1979
  • State v. Dickinson 370 So. 2d 557 La. 1979
  • State v. Jackson 367 So. 2d 353 La. 1979
  • State v. Constantine 364 So. 2d 1011 La. 1978
    15:445 and 446 and this court's interpretation of these statutes () or as part of the res gestae.
  • State v. Unger 362 So. 2d 1095 La. 1978
    (1978); State v. Mitchell, La., (1978); State v. Sheppard, La., (1977); State v. Ross, La., (1977).
  • State v. Lewis 358 So. 2d 1285 La. 1978
    decided April 10, 1978; , decided March 6, 1978; (La.
  • State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
  • State v. Cramer 358 So. 2d 1277 La. 1978
    See State v. Mitchell, La., (1978); State v. Holstead, La., (1977).
  • Distinguished State v. Showers 359 So. 2d 104 La. 1978
    (1978), identity was held to be an arguable factual issue of consequence because of defense alibi evidence suggesting that another person had committed the crimes.