Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Firmin, 354 So. 2d 1355.

17 citing documents.

  • Overruled State of Louisiana v. Trivual A. Charles -Aka- Trivual Batiste -Aka- Trivual Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    To the extent that cases state to the contrary, they are overruled.
  • Overruled State v. Charles 270 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    To the extent that cases state to the contrary, including State v. Sanders , and State v. Firmin , they are overruled.
  • State v. Mandigo 136 So. 3d 292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    In support-of his position
  • State v. Holloway 120 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    To support this contention, the defendant relies on two Louisiana Supreme Court decisions, which have since been overruled.
  • Overruled State of Louisiana v. Christopher Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    To the extent that cases state to the contrary, they are overruled.
  • Overruled State v. Guillory 120 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    To the extent that cases state to the contrary, they are overruled.
  • State v. Lewis 104 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    we then extended Sanders to cases in which the state relied on one prior felony conviction in charging a violation of La.R.S.
  • State v. Guidera 111 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    (per curiam), prevented the double use of a defendant’s recidivist offender status, thereby preventing the state from using a defendant’s recidivist offense as part of a habitual offender allegation.
  • State v. Shoupe 71 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. LANDOR 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In his pro se brief, (La.
  • State v. Foster 3 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    to the extent that they were not consistent with this ruling.
  • State v. Dotie 1 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Platt 998 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Legal Principles Although not clearly expressed, in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that an adjudication for being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm could not be further enhanced under the habitual offender law.
  • State v. Brooks 997 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    However, in Baker , the court overruled Sanders , and held that a sentence for a person convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm could be enhanced under the habitual offender law as long as the prior felony conviction that is used as an element in the firearm conviction is not also used as a prior felony conviction in the multiple offender bil
  • State v. Brooks 997 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    However, in Baker , the court overruled Sanders , and held that a sentence for a person convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm could be enhanced under the habitual offender law as long as the prior felony conviction that is used as an element in the firearm conviction is not also used as a prior felony conviction in the multiple offender bil
  • State v. Baker 970 So. 2d 948 La. 2008
    The appellate court rejected Baker's sole argument that his adjudication and sentencing as an habitual offender following his conviction for felon in possession of a firearm constituted "double enhancement"
  • State v. Baker 935 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006