Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 363 So. 2d 639.

55 citing documents.

State v. Winn 412 So. 2d 1337 La. 1982
one of the reasons underlying this rule of evidence is that: "...
State v. Garrison 400 So. 2d 874 La. 1981
[1] : "Under the generally accepted view an entrapment is perpetrated when a law enforcement official or a person acting in cooperation with such an official, for the purpose of obtaining evidence of the commission of an offense, solicits, encourages, or otherwise induces another person to engage in conduct const
State v. Moody 393 So. 2d 1212 La. 1981
State v. Mead 377 So. 2d 79 La. 1979
on original hearing, [2] which held that it was improper for the state's first witness, an assistant United States Attorney, to testify concerning the credibility of the state's next witness, a narcotics informant, prior to the impeachment of that witness by the defense.
State v. Bonanno 373 So. 2d 1284 La. 1979
(on rehearing), requires that a clear demonstration of defense intent to urge entrapment precede the introduction at trial of evidence of other criminal activity to prove predisposition.