DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sims v. Sims, 358 So. 2d 919.

196 citing documents.

  • Bedenbender v. Bedenbender 679 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    For the following reasons
  • Mercer v. Mercer 671 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Johnson v. Wetherspoon 669 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Ordoyne v. Ordoyne, 94-1766 (La.App.
  • Edgecombe v. Edgecombe 666 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Withers v. Withers 661 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    In this action between divorced litigants, Gerald Withers appeals a judgment denying his demands to modify a 1992 Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) which calculated his ex-wife's interest in his retirement plan with his employer, International Paper Company
  • Ordoyne v. Ordoyne 653 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Alford v. Alford 653 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    The trial court specifically found that the profit sharing plan is not a pension and, due to this finding, and progeny formula.
  • DeMontluzin v. Martinez 652 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    This case presents a unique problem caused by the fact that Louisiana’s for dividing defined benefit retirement and pension plans in community property partition cases.
  • Brant v. Brant 649 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Bodenheimer v. Freitag 651 So. 2d 251 La. 1995
  • Stewart v. Stewart 644 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Rather, the judgment stated that the pension plan and its accrued interest, totaling $165,052.00, were to be divided “according to Simms (sic) formula,”
  • Futch v. Futch 643 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    Art. 2338; Hare, supra ; T.L.
  • Goodwyne v. Goodwyne 639 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    James and Co., support a conclusion that because the amount that the defendant was entitled to receive under the CBA was computed using total years of service, the plaintiff is entitled to a proportionate share of the CBA, in addition t
  • Sherrill v. Sherrill 639 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • Thibodeaux v. Thibodeaux 640 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Mechana v. Lambert 635 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    LAW APPLICABLE TO CLASSIFICATION OF PENSION BENEFITS The Louisiana Supreme Court in Hare reviewed the traditional concepts used in classifying pension plans as community property and recognized the need for periodic departures from the formula outlined in Sims v. *749 Sims
  • Killgore v. Killgore 635 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    Applying a the trial court concluded that Yvonne Killgore was entitled to 41.5 percent *484 of W.T.
  • Croft v. Croft 634 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • McCown v. McCown 634 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Madere v. Madere 632 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • Cutting v. Cutting 625 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Traylor v. Traylor 623 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    La.Civ.Code art. 2338; T.L.
  • Harmon v. Harmon 617 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Courtney v. Courtney 613 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    art. 2338; Hare v. Hodgins, supra
  • Webber v. Berry 609 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    In this case, Don D. Webber appeals a judgment which partitioned his future retirement benefits under the "fixed percentage method"
  • Stubbs v. Stubbs 610 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    y benefits that were being paid into the fund during the period of participation shall begin being paid to the retiree.” 1 *896 Therefore, we must conclude that a division of DROP funds for purposes of a
  • McDonald v. McDonald 607 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    which is as follows: [[Image here]] Therefore, Mayona Lou McDonald is hereby recognized as having an interest according to the above cited formula in any Citgo retirement plan in favor of George Mills McDonald and an interest in any annuity or lump sum payment paid by Citgo to Mr. McDonald.
  • Wirstrom v. Wirstrom 608 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    was decided by the Supreme Court in 1978, and set out a formula for dividing community owned pension benefits.
  • Johnson v. Johnson 605 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • Frazier v. Harper 600 So. 2d 59 La. 1992
    art. 2338; Hare v. Hodgins, supra
  • Chiappetta v. Vallot 596 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • Moore v. Moore 596 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    formula and accepted instead the valuation by the husband's expert "pension consultant."
  • Halverson v. Halverson 589 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
    In the judgment on appeal, Mrs. Peck was awarded a 24.11% interest in the pension plan, a
  • Williams v. Williams 590 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    In doing so, and its progeny, (La.App.
  • Hare v. Hodgins 586 So. 2d 118 La. 1991
    La.Civ.Code art. 2338; T.L.
  • Stewart v. Stewart 585 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    He complains that the Trial Court applied the "fixed percentage"
  • Johnson v. Johnson 582 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • Frazier v. Harper 582 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Berges v. Berges 579 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
  • Succession of Netterville 579 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • Fernandez v. Drez 575 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    the following formula was set out for determining the non-employed spouse’s share of the employed spouse’s benefits: Portion of pension attributable to creditable service during existence of community X lk x annuity (or lump-sum payment) Pension attributable to total creditable service The calculation propo
  • Distinguished Mailhes v. Mailhes 579 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Naquin v. Naquin 572 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    The parties stipulated at trial that Mr. Naquin’s
  • Dodd v. Dodd 568 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    pon Paul L. Dodd's fiftieth (50th) birthday or upon his termination of employment with Shell Oil Company, whichever occurs first, subject to judicial approval of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Eloise Hicks Dodd's interest in the Shell Pension Trust be recognized as a future interest payable in accordance with the Sims formula [ ] upon Paul L. Dodd's retirement with Shell Oil Company in the proportion that the benefits are attributable to Mr
  • Rearden v. Rearden 568 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • Hare v. Hodgins 567 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    Following a rehearing on November 8, 1989, the court rendered judgment on November 16, 1989 in favor of Mrs. Hare, finding that she is entitled to a portion of Mr. Hodgins' retirement benefits as presently received
  • Doland v. Doland 562 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • Breaux v. Breaux 555 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • Meyer v. Meyer 553 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • Landwehr v. Landwehr 547 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    with the pertinent data in its judgment as opposed to merely citing the case name in the judgment, and that the trial court further erred in ordering Mrs. Landwehr to contribute 50% of the amount necessary to repurchase any years of retirement of Mr. Landwehr.