Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 358 So. 2d 926.

104 citing documents.

Benard v. Bradley Automotive 365 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co., (La.
Fincher v. Surrette 365 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
In Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Company, (1978), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "* * * But when the danger is known to the manufacturer and cannot justifiably be expected to be within the knowledge of users generally, the manufacturer must take reasonable steps to warn the user."
Tri-State Insurance Co. of Tulsa v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N. Y. 364 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co., holds that in order to recover, a plaintiff need not prove defective design or manufacture if he proves he was injured by a product unreasonably dangerous for normal use.
Walter v. Valley 363 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
In the recent case of Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Company, (La.