Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Loehr, 355 So. 2d 925.
-
State v. Newsome
544 So. 2d 82
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
for the proposition that an affidavit which fails to state when the crimes took place and which is phrased in the past tense is insufficient to establish probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant.
- State v. Johnson 534 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
-
State v. Fairbanks
467 So. 2d 37
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
[1] Defendant, contends the affidavit fails to establish probable cause because it lacks a time reference regarding both when the confidential informant observed the alleged narcotics transactions, and when he relayed that information
- State v. Wood 457 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Manso 449 So. 2d 480 La. 1984
- State v. Granier 442 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Wise
434 So. 2d 1308
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
See State v. Gilbert , above; ; ."
- State v. Cann 392 So. 2d 381 La. 1981
-
State v. Ogden
391 So. 2d 434
La. 1980
See State v. Gilbert , above
-
State v. Normand
380 So. 2d 1207
La. 1980
this Court em *1209 phasized that “[i]t is fundamental that an affidavit upon which a search warrant is based must inform the issuing magistrate of underlying facts sufficient to support a determination that evidence of a crime is present on the premises to be searched.” In this case, the warrant conta
- State v. Morgan 376 So. 2d 99 La. 1979
-
State v. Daniel
373 So. 2d 149
La. 1979
Summers, J., dissenting; State v. Holmes, 254 La.
-
State v. Koncir
367 So. 2d 365
La. 1979
See, State v. Valentine, supra .