Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Haughton v. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Companies, 355 So. 2d 927.

90 citing documents.

Hartman v. Dittco Division of National Steel Products Co. 510 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Haughton v. Fireman’s Fund, Robertson v. Scanio Produce, supra.
Hartman v. DITTCO DIV., NAT. STEEL PROD. 510 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Robertson v. Scanio Produce, supra.
Young v. Aetna Life & Casualty Ins. Co. 497 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Haughton v. Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Companies
Youngblood v. Rotor Aids, Inc. 491 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Co., and in Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, supra, intimated that causation remains the province of the courts, not to be decided exclusively on the basis of the medical testimony.
Mitchell v. Orleans Parish School Board 483 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Haughton v. Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Cos.
Bridges v. Hood Motor Co., Inc. 477 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Walton v. Normandy Village Homes Ass'n, Inc. 475 So. 2d 320 La. 1985
Cos., Cf. Thomas v. U.S. Cas.
Sanchez v. Viccinelli Sheet Metal & Roofing Co. 473 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
James v. Celotex Corp. 461 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
It is usually the ultimate fact to be found by the court, based on all the credible evidence.’ Haughton v. Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Companies
Young v. American Marine Corp. 458 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Conrad v. Jack Donahue Contractors, Inc. 450 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Young v. Hercules, Inc. 449 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Robertson v. Scanio Produce 449 So. 2d 459 La. 1984
Frix v. Supreme Catering Service & Aetna Insurance Co. 444 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Co., , that “[i]f an accident causes a disability from which a workman would have recovered except for further disability produced by a separate, intervening cause, there is no liability for compensation beyond the disability produced by the job-connected accident.” Obviously, this is the case on which the learned trial ju
Roberts v. Sonic Drive in of Marksville 441 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Allor, supra ; Haughton v. Fireman's Fund American Ins., Co., (La.
Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc. 435 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Nash v. Ewing Timber, Inc. 431 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Hammond v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, supra
Beauclair v. Rockwood Insurance 430 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Co., ” ****** Similarly, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “The plaintiff-employee in a workmen’s compensation case bears the burden of establishing the causal connection between the disability and the employment accident by a reasonab
Martin v. Pala, Inc. 439 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Companies, plaintiff fell while at work, and broke his thigh bone.
Thum v. MRO Services Co., Inc. 430 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Gipson v. Dresser Industrial Valve Operations 428 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hebert v. Lake Charles American Press 427 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Martin v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 427 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Urbina v. Alois J. Binder Bakery, Inc. 423 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Martin v. HB Zachry Co. 424 So. 2d 1002 La. 1982
Guillory v. USF & G Co., (La.
Stevens v. Matlack, Inc. 420 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
It is usually the ultimate fact to be found by the court, based on all the credible evidence.” See Haughton v. Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Companies
Hammond v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 419 So. 2d 829 La. 1982
Guillory v. US Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 119 La. 1982
Blount v. Cooper Stevedoring Co., Inc. 416 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Hutchinson v. TG & Y. STORES CO. 412 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Cos., Kridler v. Bituminous Casualty Corp., 409 F.2d 88 (C.A.La.1969); Graham v. Jones Bros. Co., Inc., (La.
Lucido v. Aetna Life and Cas. Co. 411 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hammond v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 407 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Guillory v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 401 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Defendant concedes that the applicable rule of law is set out in Haughton v. Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Companies, as follows: “When there is an accident and a resulting disability without any intervening cause, it is presumed that the accident caused the disability.
Allor v. Belden Corp. 393 So. 2d 1233 La. 1981
Graham v. Jones Bros. Co. 393 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Companies, Gradney, supra; Johnson, supra.
Dixon v. Ruby's, Inc. 389 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Weller v. Brown 398 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Rowland v. Continental Oil Co., Inc. 374 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
BURDEN OF PROOF Plaintiff contends recent cases from our Supreme Court, hold that where an employee suffers an accident while at work it is presumed to be work-related, and the employer has the burden to prove it is not.
Cadiere v. West Gibson Products Co., Inc. 364 So. 2d 998 La. 1978
Lonzo v. Holsum Bakeries, Inc. 363 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Haughton v. Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Company